Georgia Statutes
§ 9-11-18 — Joinder of claims and remedies
Georgia·Title 9
(a)Joinder of claims. A party asserting a claim to relief as an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim may join, either as independent or as alternate claims, as many claims, legal or equitable, as he has against an opposing party.
(b)Joinder of remedies; fraudulent conveyances. Whenever a claim is one heretofore cognizable only after another claim has been prosecuted to a conclusion, the two claims may be joined in a single action; but the court shall grant relief in that action only in accordance with the relative substantive rights of the parties. In particular, a plaintiff may state a claim for money and a claim to have set aside a conveyance fraudulent as to him without first having obtained a judgment establishing the claim for money.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Georgia § 9-11-18 (Joinder of claims and remedies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lawson v. Watkins
401 S.E.2d 719 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Denton v. Browns Mill Development Co.
561 S.E.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Sentinel Offender Services, LLC v. Glover
766 S.E.2d 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Coen v. CDC Software Corp.
816 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Walker v. Walker
668 S.E.2d 330 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Jackson v. Sluder
569 S.E.2d 893 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Cohen v. McLaughlin
301 S.E.2d 37 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Bostick v. Cmm Properties, Inc.
772 S.E.2d 671 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
CMT Investment Co. v. Automated Graphics Unlimited, Inc.
333 S.E.2d 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Shah v. Shah
513 S.E.2d 730 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Hughes v. Hughes
387 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Walker v. Kroger Co.
353 S.E.2d 551 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Deutz-Allis Credit Corp. v. Phillips
360 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Shleifer v. Bridgestone-Firestone, Inc.
477 S.E.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
COEN v. CDC SOFTWARE CORPORATION
304 Ga. 105 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 9-10-10
Cash bonds permitted; docketing§ 9-10-11
When appearance bond not forfeited by failure to attend; setting aside forfeiture of appearance bond§ 9-10-113
When verification sufficient§ 9-10-130
When affidavits amendable§ 9-10-131
Bonds in judicial proceedings amendable§ 9-10-132
Amendment of misnomers on motion§ 9-10-133
Mistake by clerk or ministerial officer