Georgia Statutes
§ 33-34-6 — Selection of motor vehicle repair facility
Georgia § 33-34-6
JurisdictionGeorgia
Title33
This text of Georgia § 33-34-6 (Selection of motor vehicle repair facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O.C.G.A. § 33-34-6 (2026).
Text
(a)Subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this Code section, no insurer shall represent to a person making a claim under a motor vehicle insurance policy that the use of or the failure to use a particular repair facility or particular repair facilities may result in the nonpayment of a claim.
(b)No insurer shall require a person making a claim under a motor vehicle insurance policy to use a particular repair facility or particular repair facilities in order to settle a claim if the person making the claim can obtain the repair work on the motor vehicle at the same cost from another source.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Windsor Insurance v. Jeffery
420 S.E.2d 15 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Homick v. American Casualty Co.
433 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Rosemond v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
316 S.E.2d 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Friedman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
341 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Williams v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
356 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sills
430 S.E.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
International Indemnity Co. v. Reeves
317 S.E.2d 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Carreker v. Southern General Insurance
419 S.E.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. McFather
334 S.E.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
International Indemnity Co. v. Enfinger
352 S.E.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Ervin v. Automobile Club Insurance
361 S.E.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Georgia American Insurance v. Mills
369 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
National Surety Corp. v. McDonnell
391 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Jones v. Admiral Insurance
395 S.E.2d 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
International Indemnity Co. v. Woods
333 S.E.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Hanover Insurance v. Striggles
409 S.E.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Government Employees Insurance
445 S.E.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Voyager Casualty Insurance v. Colwell
316 S.E.2d 598 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Davis v. Harris
320 S.E.2d 200 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Leader National Insurance v. Penson
336 S.E.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 33-1-1
Short title§ 33-1-16-1
Excessive, fraudulent, or high-tech drug testing of certain individuals as fraudulent insurance act§ 33-1-17
Special Insurance Fraud Fund§ 33-1-2
Definitions§ 33-1-20
Health care sharing ministryCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Georgia § 33-34-6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ga/33-34-6.