District of Columbia Statutes

§ 28-3502 — Special promise to answer for debt or default of another.

District of Columbia § 28-3502
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 28Commercial Instruments and Transactions. [Enacted title]
Ch. 35Statute of Frauds.

This text of District of Columbia § 28-3502 (Special promise to answer for debt or default of another.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 28-3502 (2026).

Text

An action may not be brought to charge an executor or administrator upon a special promise to answer damages out of his own estate, or to charge the defendant upon a special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another person, or to charge a person upon an agreement made upon consideration of marriage, or upon a contract or sale of real estate, of any interest in or concerning it, or upon an agreement that is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof, unless the agreement upon which the action is brought, or a memorandum or note thereof, is in writing, which need not state the consideration and signed by the party to be charged therewith or a person authorized by him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interdonato v. Interdonato
521 A.2d 1124 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
46 case citations
Clampitt v. American University
957 A.2d 23 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
40 case citations
Goon v. Gee Kung Tong, Inc.
544 A.2d 277 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
40 case citations
Gregorio v. Hoover
238 F. Supp. 3d 37 (District of Columbia, 2017)
40 case citations
Railan v. Katyal
766 A.2d 998 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
39 case citations
Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
572 F. Supp. 200 (District of Columbia, 1983)
38 case citations
Launay v. Launay, Inc.
497 A.2d 443 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
34 case citations
Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
535 F. Supp. 2d 60 (District of Columbia, 2008)
27 case citations
New Economy Capital, LLC v. New Markets Capital Group
881 A.2d 1087 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
24 case citations
Clark v. Clark
535 A.2d 872 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
22 case citations
Hudson v. Ashley
411 A.2d 963 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1980)
20 case citations
R & A, INC. v. Kozy Korner, Inc.
672 A.2d 1062 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
18 case citations
Duk Hea Oh v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.
7 A.3d 997 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
16 case citations
Penick v. Frank E. Basil, Inc. of Delaware
579 F. Supp. 160 (District of Columbia, 1984)
15 case citations
Association of American Medical Colleges v. Princeton Review, Inc.
332 F. Supp. 2d 11 (District of Columbia, 2004)
13 case citations
Gharib v. Wolf
518 F. Supp. 2d 50 (District of Columbia, 2007)
13 case citations
Clay v. Hanson
536 A.2d 1097 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
11 case citations
Berlin v. Bank of America, N.A.
101 F. Supp. 3d 1 (District of Columbia, 2015)
10 case citations
Patrick v. Hardisty
483 A.2d 692 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
9 case citations
Cusimano v. First Maryland Savings & Loan, Inc.
639 A.2d 553 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1994)
8 case citations

Legislative History

Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 676, Pub. L. 88-509, § 1

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 28-3502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/28-3502.