District of Columbia Statutes
§ 20-903 — Limitation on presentation of claims against the estate.
District of Columbia § 20-903
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 20Probate and Administration of Decedents’ Estates. [Enacted title]
Ch. 9Claims.
This text of District of Columbia § 20-903 (Limitation on presentation of claims against the estate.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 20-903 (2026).
Text
(a)Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute with respect to claims of the United States and the District of Columbia, (1) all claims against a decedent’s estate, whether due or to become due, absolute or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, founded on contract or other legal basis, shall be barred against the estate, the personal representative, and the heirs and legatees, unless presented within 6 months after the date of the first publication of notice of the appointment of a personal representative; and (2) all claims against the estate based on the conduct of or a contract with a personal representative shall be barred unless an action is commenced against the estate within 6 months of the date the claim arose.
(b)Nothing in this section shall affect or prevent any actio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.
944 A.2d 1055 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington University
132 F.3d 77 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
District of Columbia v. Gantt
558 A.2d 1120 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Johnson v. Martin
567 A.2d 1299 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Matter of Estate of Phillips
532 A.2d 654 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
Murchison v. Inter-City Mortgage Corp. Profit Sharing & Pension Plans
503 F. Supp. 2d 184 (District of Columbia, 2007)
Ayers v. Landow
666 A.2d 51 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
In Re Estate of Derricotte
744 A.2d 535 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
In Re Estate of Sato
878 A.2d 1247 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
In Re Estate of Barnes
754 A.2d 284 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
Martin v. Johnson
512 A.2d 1017 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1986)
Eastern Indemnity Co. of Maryland v. Content
543 A.2d 1361 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
In re Estate of Wilson
743 A.2d 719 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
Phillips v. Bryant
744 A.2d 535 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
Topel Blueprinting Corp. v. Bryant
793 A.2d 487 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Valentine v. Elliott
819 A.2d 968 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
In Re Estate of Bryant
793 A.2d 487 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
In Re Estate of Jordan
956 A.2d 700 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Richard v. McGreevy
953 A.2d 1028 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Wilson v. Bowser
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2025)
Legislative History
June 24, 1980, D.C. Law 3-72, § 101, 27 DCR 2155
Nearby Sections
15
§ 20-101
Definitions.§ 20-102
Verification.§ 20-103
Notice.§ 20-104
Presumption.§ 20-105
Devolution of property at death.§ 20-106
Preference.§ 20-107
Right to seek Court resolution.§ 20-108.01
Effect of fraud and evasion.§ 20-109
Effective date.§ 20-1101
Renunciation; legatee or heir.§ 20-1104
Distribution; effect.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 20-903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/20-903.