District of Columbia Statutes

§ 2-1901 — Definitions.

District of Columbia·Title 2 Government Administration.·Ch. 19 Government Language Accessibility.·Subch. I Interpreters.

For the purposes of this chapter, the term:

(1)“Appointing authority” means the presiding judge of any court of the District of Columbia, the chairperson of any District of Columbia board or commission, the director or commissioner of any department or agency of the District of Columbia, the Chairman of the Council of the District of Columbia or the chairperson of any committee of the Council of the District of Columbia conducting a hearing, or any other person presiding at any hearing or other proceeding in which a qualified interpreter is required pursuant to this chapter.
(2)“Communication-impaired person” means a hearing-impaired person or a non-English or limited-English speaking person.
(3)“Hearing-impaired person” means a person who, because of a hearing impairment, cannot rea

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia § 2-1901 (Definitions.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melvin Andrade v. United States
88 A.3d 134 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
27 case citations
Castellon v. United States
864 A.2d 141 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
21 case citations
Wei Hua Wu v. United States
798 A.2d 1083 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
19 case citations
Morales v. United States
866 A.2d 67 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
11 case citations
Mesa v. United States
875 A.2d 79 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
9 case citations
Ramirez v. United States
877 A.2d 1040 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
7 case citations
Rivera v. United States
941 A.2d 434 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
6 case citations
Torres v. United States
929 A.2d 880 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
1 case citations
Asefu Alemayehu v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
109 A.3d 1095 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
Rocha-Guzmán v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
170 A.3d 170 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)

Legislative History

Jan. 28, 1988, D.C. Law 7-62, § 2, 34 DCR 7426; Apr. 24, 2007, D.C. Law 16-306, § 201(a), 53 DCR 8610

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗