District of Columbia Statutes

§ 16-909 — Proof of child’s relationship to parents.

District of Columbia § 16-909
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 9Divorce, Annulment, Separation, Support, Etc.

This text of District of Columbia § 16-909 (Proof of child’s relationship to parents.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-909 (2026).

Text

(a)A father-child relationship is established by an adjudication of a man’s parentage, by operation of subsection (e) of this section, or by an unrebutted presumption pursuant to this subsection. There shall be a presumption that a man is the father of a child:
(1)If he and the child’s mother are or have been married, or in a domestic partnership, at the time of either conception or birth, or between conception and birth, and the child is born during the marriage or domestic partnership, or within 300 days after the termination of marital cohabitation by reason of death, annulment, divorce, or separation ordered by a court, or within 300 days after the termination of the domestic partnership pursuant to § 32-702(d) or § 16-904(e) ; or
(2)If, prior to the child’s birth, he and the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. McCloud
650 A.2d 202 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1994)
102 case citations
Davis v. Davis
663 A.2d 499 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
40 case citations
District of Columbia Ex Rel. W.J.D. v. E.M.
467 A.2d 457 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1983)
29 case citations
In Re Estate of Glover
470 A.2d 743 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1983)
15 case citations
Dews v. Dews
632 A.2d 1160 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
14 case citations
S.A. v. M.A.
531 A.2d 1246 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
10 case citations
In re T.M.
665 A.2d 207 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
8 case citations
Matthews Ex Rel. Matthews v. District of Columbia
875 A.2d 650 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
8 case citations
In Re Estate of Rosa North Ford Raymond North-Bey
200 A.3d 1207 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)
3 case citations
Gilliam v. Branton
470 A.2d 743 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1983)
1 case citations
In re D.W.
27 A.3d 1164 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
1 case citations
M.D. v. R.W.
194 A.3d 374 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2018)
1 case citations
M.D. v. R.W. and L.P. v. M.D.
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2018)
M.M. v. T-M.M.
995 A.2d 164 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
Mm v. Tm. M.
995 A.2d 164 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)

Legislative History

Dec. 23, 1963, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1, 77 Stat. 561; Apr. 7, 1977, D.C. Law 1-107, title I, § 106, 23 DCR 8737; Feb. 24, 1987, D.C. Law 6-166, § 33(a)(3), 33 DCR 6710; June 18, 1991, D.C. Law 9-5, § 2(c), 38 DCR 2717; Aug. 17, 1991, D.C. Law 9-39, § 2(c), 38 DCR 4970; Mar. 16, 1995, D.C. Law 10-223, § 2(b), 41 DCR 8051; Apr. 3, 2001, D.C. Law 13-269, § 106(c), 48 DCR 1270; July 18, 2008, D.C. Law 18-33, § 3(d), 56 DCR 4269; Dec. 10, 2009, D.C. Law 18-88, § 402, 56 DCR 7413; Mar. 19, 2013, D.C. Law 19-233, § 2(b), 59 DCR 14769; Apr. 9, 2016, D.C. Law 21-105, § 2(b), 63 DCR 217

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-909.