District of Columbia Statutes

§ 16-5502 — Special motion to dismiss.

District of Columbia·Title 16 Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]·Ch. 55 Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.
(a)A party may file a special motion to dismiss any claim arising from an act in furtherance of the right of advocacy on issues of public interest within 45 days after service of the claim.
(b)If a party filing a special motion to dismiss under this section makes a prima facie showing that the claim at issue arises from an act in furtherance of the right of advocacy on issues of public interest, then the motion shall be granted unless the responding party demonstrates that the claim is likely to succeed on the merits, in which case the motion shall be denied.
(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, upon the filing of a special motion to dismiss, discovery proceedings on the claim shall be stayed until the motion has been disposed of.
(2)When it appears likely

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia § 16-5502 (Special motion to dismiss.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANN
150 A.3d 1213 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
73 case citations
3m Company v. Boulter
842 F. Supp. 2d 85 (District of Columbia, 2012)
37 case citations
ARTHUR G. NEWMYER v. THE SIDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL and JAMES F. HUNTINGTON
128 A.3d 1023 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
36 case citations
Abbas v. Foreign Policy Group, LLC
975 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2013)
22 case citations
Boley v. Atlantic Monthly Group
950 F. Supp. 2d 249 (District of Columbia, 2013)
15 case citations
Akhmetshin v. Browder
(District of Columbia, 2024)
American Studies Association v. Bronner
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Arpaio v. Cottle
(District of Columbia, 2019)
Banks v. Hoffman
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2023)
Close It! Title Services, Inc. v. Nadel
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)

Legislative History

Mar. 31, 2011, D.C. Law 18-351, § 3, 58 DCR 741; Apr. 20, 2012, D.C. Law 19-120, § 201, 58 DCR 11235; Sept. 26, 2012, D.C. Law 19-171, § 401, 59 DCR 6190

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗