District of Columbia Statutes

§ 16-2359 — Adjudicatory hearing.

District of Columbia § 16-2359
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 23Family Division [Family Court] Proceedings.
Subch. IIIProceedings Regarding the Termination of Parental Rights of Certain Neglected Children.

This text of District of Columbia § 16-2359 (Adjudicatory hearing.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-2359 (2026).

Text

(a)A judge shall begin the adjudicatory hearing by determining whether all parties are present and whether proper notice of the hearing has been given. If the parent has been given proper notice but has failed to appear the judge may proceed in his or her absence.
(b)A judge shall hear evidence presented by the moving party and the burden of proof shall rest upon the moving party.
(c)Every party shall have the right to present evidence, to be heard in his or her own behalf and to cross-examine witnesses called by another party.
(d)All evidence which is relevant, material, and competent to the issues before the judge shall be admitted.
(e)Notwithstanding the provisions of D.C. Official Code, sections 14-306 and 14-307, neither the spouse or domestic partner privilege nor the physic

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of H.R.
581 A.2d 1141 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
85 case citations
In re A.R.
679 A.2d 470 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
42 case citations
Johnson v. United States
616 A.2d 1216 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
37 case citations
In re O.L.
584 A.2d 1230 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
35 case citations
In re A.W.
569 A.2d 168 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
30 case citations
Matter of Baby Girl DS
600 A.2d 71 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
24 case citations
In Re An. C.
722 A.2d 36 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
20 case citations
In re I.B.
631 A.2d 1225 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
20 case citations
In re T.W.
623 A.2d 116 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
20 case citations
In re A.S.C.
671 A.2d 942 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
18 case citations
In re L.H.
634 A.2d 1230 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
9 case citations
In re D.R.
673 A.2d 1259 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
8 case citations
In re N.P.
882 A.2d 241 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
8 case citations
In re P.D.
664 A.2d 337 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
7 case citations
B.R.L.F. v. Zuniga
200 A.3d 770 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)
5 case citations
In re C.V.
719 A.2d 1246 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
1 case citations
B.R.L.F. v. Lilian Marleny Sarceno Zuniga
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)
In Re AG
900 A.2d 677 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
In Re Clo
41 A.3d 502 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
In Re CT
724 A.2d 590 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)

Legislative History

Sept. 23, 1977, D.C. Law 2-22, title IV, § 410, 24 DCR 3341; Mar. 3, 1979, D.C. Law 2-136, § 805(d), 25 DCR 5055; Sept. 6, 1980, D.C. Law 3-85,§ 4, 27 DCR 2900; Sept. 12, 2008, D.C. Law 17-231, § 20(h), 55 DCR 6758

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-2359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-2359.