District of Columbia Statutes
§ 16-2353 — Grounds for termination of parent and child relationship.
District of Columbia § 16-2353
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 23Family Division [Family Court] Proceedings.
Subch. IIIProceedings Regarding the Termination of Parental Rights of Certain Neglected Children.
This text of District of Columbia § 16-2353 (Grounds for termination of parent and child relationship.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-2353 (2026).
Text
(a)A judge may enter an order for the termination of the parent and child relationship when the judge finds from the evidence presented, after giving due consideration to the interests of all parties, that the termination is in the best interests of the child.
(b)In determining whether it is in the child’s best interests that the parent and child relationship be terminated, a judge shall consider each of the following factors:
(1)the child’s need for continuity of care and caretakers and for timely integration into a stable and permanent home, taking into account the differences in the development and the concept of time of children of different ages;
(2)the physical, mental and emotional health of all individuals involved to the degree that such affects the welfare of the child
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Appeal of H.R.
581 A.2d 1141 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
In re A.B.E.
564 A.2d 751 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
In re A.R.
679 A.2d 470 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
In re A.C.
597 A.2d 920 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Appeal of U.S.W.
541 A.2d 625 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
Application of LL
653 A.2d 873 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
In Re Antj. P.
812 A.2d 965 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Crescent Properties v. Inabinet
897 A.2d 782 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
In re A.B.
955 A.2d 161 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
E.C. v. District of Columbia
589 A.2d 1245 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
In Re ACG
894 A.2d 436 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
Legislative History
Sept. 23, 1977, D.C. Law 2-22, title IV, § 410, 24 DCR 3341; Mar. 15, 1990, D.C. Law 8-87, § 4(b), (c), 37 DCR 50; June 8, 1990, D.C. Law 8-134,§ 2(d), 37 DCR 2613; Mar. 24, 1998, D.C. Law 12-81, § 10(hh), 45 DCR 745; Apr. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-264, § 57(b)(2), 46 DCR 2118
Nearby Sections
15
§ 16-1001
Definitions.§ 16-1002
Complaint of criminal conduct.§ 16-1005
Hearing; evidence; protection order.§ 16-1006
Jurisdiction.§ 16-1007
Notice to parties.§ 16-101
Parties.§ 16-1021
Definitions.§ 16-1022
Prohibited acts.§ 16-1024
Penalties.§ 16-1025
Prosecution by Attorney General.§ 16-1026
Expungement.§ 16-1031
Arrests.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-2353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-2353.