District of Columbia Statutes
§ 16-2304 — Right to counsel; party status.
District of Columbia·Title 16 Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]·Ch. 23 Family Division [Family Court] Proceedings.·Subch. I Proceedings Regarding Delinquency, Neglect, or Need of Supervision.
(a)A child alleged to be delinquent or in need of supervision is entitled to be represented by counsel at all critical stages of Division proceedings, including the time of admission or denial of allegations in the petition and all subsequent stages. If the child and his parent, guardian, or custodian are financially unable to obtain adequate representation, the child shall be entitled to have counsel appointed for him in accordance with rules established by the Superior Court. In its discretion, the Division may appoint counsel for the child over the objection of the child, his parent, guardian, or other custodian.
(1)When a child is alleged to be neglected or when the termination of the parent and child relationship is under consideration, the parent, guardian, or custodian of the c
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
District of Columbia § 16-2304 (Right to counsel; party status.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roth, Pamela v. King, Rufus
449 F.3d 1272 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
Family Division Trial Lawyers of the Superior court-d.c., Inc. v. H. Carl Moultrie, Chief Judge, D.C. Superior Court
725 F.2d 695 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
S.S. v. D.M.
597 A.2d 870 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
In Re J.J.Z.
630 A.2d 186 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Appeal of A.H.
590 A.2d 123 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Matter of Baby Girl DS
600 A.2d 71 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
In Re Jam. J.
825 A.2d 902 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
In re AK. V.
747 A.2d 570 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
In re K.I.
735 A.2d 448 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
In re W.T.L.
656 A.2d 1123 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
Cloutterbuck v. Cloutterbuck
556 A.2d 1082 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
In re Petition of J.O. & P.O., N.B. & Ki.B.
176 A.3d 144 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2018)
In re L.H.
634 A.2d 1230 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
In re P.D.
664 A.2d 337 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
In re Petition of R.E.S.
978 A.2d 182 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
In re W.A.F.
573 A.2d 1264 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
In re D.R.
541 A.2d 1260 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
In re Phy. W.
722 A.2d 1263 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
In Re RKS
905 A.2d 201 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
In Re SG
581 A.2d 771 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Legislative History
Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 587, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 526, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 121(a); Sept. 23, 1977, D.C. Law 2-22, title IV, § 402, 24 DCR 3341; June 4, 1982, D.C. Law 4-114, § 2, 29 DCR 1699; Mar. 13, 1985, D.C. Law 5-129, § 2(b), 31 DCR 5192; June 27, 2000, D.C. Law 13-136, § 301(b), 47 DCR 2850
Nearby Sections
15
§ 16-1001
Definitions.§ 16-1002
Complaint of criminal conduct.§ 16-1005
Hearing; evidence; protection order.§ 16-1006
Jurisdiction.§ 16-1007
Notice to parties.§ 16-101
Parties.§ 16-1021
Definitions.§ 16-1022
Prohibited acts.§ 16-1024
Penalties.§ 16-1025
Prosecution by Attorney General.§ 16-1026
Expungement.§ 16-1031
Arrests.