District of Columbia Statutes

§ 16-1501 — Definition; summons.

District of Columbia § 16-1501
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 16Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. [Enacted title]
Ch. 15Forcible Entry and Detainer.

This text of District of Columbia § 16-1501 (Definition; summons.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 16-1501 (2026).

Text

(a)When a person detains possession of real property without right, or after his right to possession has ceased, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, on complaint under oath verified by the person aggrieved by the detention, or by his agent or attorney having knowledge of the facts, may issue a summons in English and Spanish to the party complained of to appear and show cause why judgment should not be given against him for the restitution of possession.
(b)A person aggrieved shall not file a complaint seeking restitution of possession pursuant to this section for nonpayment of rent in an amount less than $600. Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the person aggrieved from filing a complaint to recover the amount owed.
(1)A person aggrieved shall not file a complaint

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drayton v. Poretsky Management, Inc.
462 A.2d 1115 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1983)
42 case citations
Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre Corporation
920 F.2d 996 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
26 case citations
Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
89 A.3d 115 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
23 case citations
Simpson v. Lee
499 A.2d 889 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
20 case citations
Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.
917 A.2d 95 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
19 case citations
Lipscomb v. Raddatz Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
109 F. Supp. 3d 251 (District of Columbia, 2015)
15 case citations
Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership
712 A.2d 487 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
10 case citations
Harkins v. Win Corp.
771 A.2d 1025 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
9 case citations
Ayers v. Landow
666 A.2d 51 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
6 case citations
Morgan v. Barry
785 F. Supp. 187 (District of Columbia, 1992)
6 case citations
Shannon & Luchs Co. v. Jeter
469 A.2d 812 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1983)
4 case citations
Stancil v. Bradley Investments, LLC (In re Stancil)
473 B.R. 478 (District of Columbia, 2012)
4 case citations
Estate of Ellis ex rel. Clark v. Hoes
677 A.2d 50 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
2 case citations
Amiri v. United States of America
(District of Columbia, 2012)
District of Columbia v. Towers
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021)
Gallo v. District of Columbia
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Alexander Gallo v. DC
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)

Legislative History

Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 581, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 560, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 145(g)(1); June 29, 1984, D.C. Law 5-90,§ 2(a), 31 DCR 2537

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 16-1501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/16-1501.