District of Columbia Statutes

§ 14-306 — Spouse or domestic partner.

District of Columbia § 14-306
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 14Proof. [Enacted title]
Ch. 3Competency of Witnesses.

This text of District of Columbia § 14-306 (Spouse or domestic partner.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 14-306 (2026).

Text

(a)In civil and criminal proceedings, a spouse or domestic partner is competent but not compellable to testify for or against their spouse or domestic partner.
(b)In civil and criminal proceedings, a spouse or domestic partner is not competent to testify as to any confidential communications made by one to the other during the marriage or the domestic partnership. (b-1) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of this section, a spouse or domestic partner is both competent and compellable to testify against his or her spouse or domestic partner as to both confidential communications made by one to the other during the marriage or domestic partnership and any other matter in:
(1)A criminal or delinquency proceeding where one spouse or domestic partner is charged with committing:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anderson
39 F.3d 331 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
80 case citations
Kendall v. Gore Properties, Inc.
236 F.2d 673 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
56 case citations
Hammill v. United States
498 A.2d 551 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
54 case citations
Coleman v. United States
948 A.2d 534 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
45 case citations
United States v. Frank Lewis
433 F.2d 1146 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
39 case citations
Bowler v. United States
480 A.2d 678 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
38 case citations
Johnson v. United States
616 A.2d 1216 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
37 case citations
Jackson v. United States
623 A.2d 571 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
35 case citations
Michael D. Tann v. United States
127 A.3d 400 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
34 case citations
Alston v. United States
462 A.2d 1122 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1983)
31 case citations
Hollingsworth v. United States
531 A.2d 973 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
30 case citations
Beard v. United States
535 A.2d 1373 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
28 case citations
Puma v. Sullivan
746 A.2d 871 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
20 case citations
Riley v. United States
923 A.2d 868 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
17 case citations
Mesa v. United States
875 A.2d 79 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
9 case citations
Darnell Hawkins & Marvin Verter, Jr. v. United States
119 A.3d 687 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
8 case citations
Egbuka v. United States
968 A.2d 511 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
8 case citations
Smith v. United States
947 A.2d 1131 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
8 case citations
Croom v. United States
546 A.2d 1006 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
4 case citations
Kendall v. Gore Properties
236 F.2d 673 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
3 case citations

Legislative History

Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 519, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; Apr. 4, 2006, D.C. Law 16-79, § 2(b), 53 DCR 1035; Dec. 10, 2009, D.C. Law 18-88, § 206, 56 DCR 7413

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 14-306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/14-306.