Connecticut Statutes
§ 46b-569 — (Formerly Sec. 46b-171). Judgment of court or family support magistrate. Support orders. Past-due support. Reopened judgment of parentage.
Connecticut § 46b-569
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 46bFamily Law
Ch. 818Connecticut Parentage Act and Parentage-Related Provisions
This text of Connecticut § 46b-569 ((Formerly Sec. 46b-171). Judgment of court or family support magistrate. Support orders. Past-due support. Reopened judgment of parentage.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-569 (2026).
Text
(a)(1)(A) If the defendant is found to be the parent of the child, the court or family support magistrate shall order the defendant to stand charged with the support and maintenance of such child, with the assistance of any other parent if such parent is financially able, as the court or family support magistrate finds, in accordance with the provisions of subsection (b) of section 17b-179, or section 17a-90, 17b-81, 17b-223, 17b-745, 46b-129, 46b-130 or 46b-215, to be reasonably commensurate with the financial ability of the defendant, and to pay a certain sum periodically until the child attains the age of eighteen years or as otherwise provided in this subsection. If such child is unmarried and a full-time high school student, such support shall continue according to the parents' respec
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 8180; 1957, P.A. 462, S. 1; 1959, P.A. 115, S. 3; 639, S. 1; 1969, P.A. 297; P.A. 89-360, S. 15, 42, 45; P.A. 90-188, S. 3; P.A. 91-76, S. 3, 7; P.A. 93-329, S. 11; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-7, S. 22, 38; P.A. 99-279, S. 30, 45; May 9 Sp. Sess. P.A. 02-7, S. 43; P.A. 04-100, S. 2; P.A. 06-149, S. 12; P.A. 07-247, S. 11; P.A. 11-214, S. 12; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-2, S. 81; P.A. 21-15, S. 126; 21-104, S. 34; P.A. 22-145, S. 4.) History: 1959 acts stipulated court order be for support as well as maintenance, made mother's assistance depend on whether she is financially able, confined time for payments to period before child reaches 18 years rather than for such time as court judges proper, substituted provision for expense of support and maintenance before judgment is rendered for nursing expenses to that time, making whole amount rather than half payable to complainant, specified cost of suit be taxed as in other civil actions, together with attorney's fee, deleted provisions that court direct payment to welfare commissioner and issue execution on same, substituting application of Sec. 17-323a, and specified that failure of defendant to obey order for support “may be punished as for contempt of court” and that “costs of commitment of any person imprisoned therefor shall be paid by the state as in criminal cases”; 1969 act substituted “community correctional center” for “jail”; Sec. 52-442 transferred to Sec. 46b-171 in 1979; P.A. 89-360 changed “guilty” to “to be the father of the child”, added language re determination of financial ability of mother, changed “weekly” to “periodically”, deleted determination and order for lying-in expense and authorized court to make and enforce orders for unpaid support contributions pursuant to Sec. 17-31i(b), 17-32, 17-82e, 17-295, 46b-129 or 46b-130 and added references to family support magistrates throughout section; P.A. 90-188 amended section by adding provision permitting modification of child support orders upon showing of substantial change of circumstances or substantial deviation from child support guidelines established under P.A. 89-203 unless inequitable or inappropriate, and prohibiting retroactive modification of order of periodic payment or permanent alimony or support, except during period of pending motion for modification; P.A. 91-76 added provision re rebuttable presumption that deviation of less than 15% from child support guidelines is not substantial and any deviation of more than 15% is substantial and permitting modification of support order without regard to whether order issued before on or after May 9, 1991; P.A. 93-329 added Subsec. (b) re refund of money paid for support when judgment of paternity is reopened and person who was adjudicated the father of child who is or was supported by the state is found not to be the father of such child; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-7 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provisions requiring support order to contain order for health care coverage in IV-D case and re order to person who is not incapacitated to participate in work activities and added Subsec. (c) re copy of order, modification or other determination to each party and to state case registry within 14 days after issuance, effective July 1, 1997; P.A. 99-279 amended Subsec. (a) by dividing it into six Subdivs., making technical changes and adding in Subdiv. (2) provisions re health care coverage under HUSKY Plan where coverage is unavailable at reasonable cost through a parent, effective July 1, 1999; May 9 Sp. Sess. P.A. 02-7 amended Subsec. (a)(2) by adding provision re enforcement of employment-based order using a National Medical Support Notice; P.A. 04-100 amended Subsec. (a)(1) and (2) by adding provision re continuation of support for unmarried, full-time high school student residing with custodial parent and making technical and conforming changes; P.A. 06-149 amended Subsec. (a) to make technical changes and insert Subpara. designators (A) and (B) in Subdiv. (1), amended Subsec. (a)(1)(A) to delete “and residing with the custodial parent”, amended Subsec. (a)(1)(B) to add provisions re redirection of payments and notice thereof and requiring payments to be distributed as required by Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, amended Subsec. (a)(2) to substitute exemption from insurance payment requirements for low-income obligors for prior exemption if premium payments would reduce amount of support required under child support guidelines, and amended Subsec. (a)(3) to provide that liability for past-due support shall be limited to 3 years next preceding the filing of petition, effective June 6, 2006; P.A. 07-247 amended Subsec. (a)(2) by inserting Subpara. designators (A) to (F), by specifying that court or family support magistrate may order either or both parents to provide health care coverage for the child, by specifying that either parent may be ordered to name a child as a beneficiary of any medical or dental insurance plan carried by or available to such parent at a reasonable cost, by describing reasonable cost re maintaining health care coverage, by deleting language that required applying for coverage under HUSKY Plan, Part B only if noncustodial parent had sufficient ability to pay the appropriate premium, by providing that court or family support magistrate may order either parent to provide for coverage under HUSKY Plan, Part B, or alternatively enter order for cash medical support as long as any such order was reasonable, by defining “cash medical support” and requirements related to entry of a cash medical support order and by making technical changes; P.A. 11-214 amended Subsec. (a)(3) to make a technical change; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-2 made technical changes in Subsec. (a)(3); P.A. 21-15 amended Subsec (a)(1)(A) by replacing “father of the child” with “parent of the child” and replacing “the mother if such mother” with “any other parent if such parent”, amended Subsec. (a)(4) by replacing “mother” with “parent receiving support” and by making a technical change, amended Subsec. (a)(5) by replacing “the mother of such child” with “another parent of such child” and deleting provision re modification of support order issued before, on or after May 9, 1991, and amended Subsec. (b) by replacing “paternity” with “parentage” and replacing “father of a child” with “parent of a child”, effective January 1, 2022; P.A. 21-104 added Subsec. (a)(2)(E)(ii)(II) re affidavits and amended Subsec. (a)(5) to add provision re finding on the record “at a hearing, or in a written judgment, order or memorandum of decision of the court”, effective June 28, 2021; P.A. 22-145 amended Subsec. (b) by adding Subdivs. (1) and (2) re opening or setting aside a parentage judgment, redesignated existing provision as Subdiv. (3) and therein changed “reopens” to “opens”, effective July 1, 2022; Sec. 46b-171 transferred to Sec. 46b-569 in 2023. Annotations to former section 52-442: Form of finding and judgment. 2 C. 157; 3 C. 585; 5 C. 426. “Maintenance” defined. 2 C. 157; 4 C. 567. Form of bond. 2 R. 497; 1 R. 230. Burial expenses of the child do not fall within “lying-in or nursing” expenses. 67 C. 345. Amount and duration of weekly payments rest in discretion of court; requiring payments until child is 14 held reasonable. 93 C. 324. Judgment for defendant in bastardy action held a bar to subsequent action for seduction brought by father of original plaintiff. 104 C. 592. Town may be third party beneficiary on bond given to mother. 128 C. 322. Order contemplated by Secs. 52-439a and 52-440 and this section is not only for the protection of the mother but also of the town. 143 C. 688. The amount and duration of the order for support of the child is a matter within the sound discretion of the court. 147 C. 423. Does not confer jurisdiction over bastardy actions. 165 C. 33. Cited. 170 C. 367. Person adjudged the father may be charged the support of caretaker mother when necessary for proper maintenance of child. 175 C. 438. Cited. 20 CS 350; 34 CS 281; 35 CS 603. Assessment against father of full expense of supporting child until judgment without consideration of mother's financial ability does not constitute invidious discrimination based upon sex. Id., 628. Basis of father's liability for support of child's caretaker grandmother is the services performed for the benefit of the child. 36 CS 504. Cited. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 582; 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 553, 554. Evidence of photograph of child and blood test not necessary to prove paternity where defendant had been sole lover of plaintiff, previously virgin, and their admission held not harmful. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 713. Statute should be used to order support of child when defendant is adjudged father. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 484. Cited. Id., 578. Ascertainment of lying-in expenses is in sound discretion of court; plaintiff not obliged to assist in paying lying-in expenses. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 22. Cited. Id., 520. Annotations to former section 46b-171: Cited. 188 C. 354; 194 C. 52; 196 C. 407; Id., 413; 197 C. 87; 216 C. 85; 225 C. 185; 236 C. 582. Cited. 9 CA 327; 22 CA 583; 25 CA 563. Unlike Sec. 46b-62, this section does not require court to consider specific statutory factors in fashioning awards, but merely requires that exercise of court's broad discretion be reasonable. 75 CA 625. Cited. 35 CS 679; 37 CS 745; Id., 885. Words “support and maintenance” as employed in statute encompass support for caretaker mother when necessary for proper maintenance of the child. 39 CS 485. Subsec. (a): Subdiv. (1): Court is not required to award mandatory attorney's fees pursuant to an action brought under Sec. 46b-160 when the establishment of paternity is not an issue in the case. 140 CA 229.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 46b-115a
Definitions.§ 46b-115b
Proceedings governed by other law.§ 46b-115bb
Service of petition and order.§ 46b-115c
Application to Indian tribes.§ 46b-115cc
Hearing and order.§ 46b-115d
International application of chapter.§ 46b-115dd
Order to take physical custody of child.§ 46b-115e
Effect of child custody determination.§ 46b-115ee
Costs, fees and expenses.§ 46b-115f
Priority.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 46b-569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/46b-569.