(1949 Rev., S. 2634, subs. (a)–(e); 1949, 1953, 1955, S. 1469d, subs. (a)–(e); 1957, P.A. 50; 1959, P.A. 293; 1967, P.A. 698; 1969, P.A. 794, S. 7; 1971, P.A. 150; 184; 231; 253; 1972, P.A. 127, S. 24; 294, S. 18; P.A. 73-205, S. 5; 73-546, S. 2; 73-625, S. 3, 4; P.A. 74-251, S. 10, 11; P.A. 75-420, S. 4, 6; 75-492, S. 1, 2; 75-602, S. 4, 13; P.A. 76-436, S. 16, 668, 681; P.A. 77-272; 77-273; 77-614, S. 71, 521, 587, 610; P.A. 78-223, S. 1, 2; 78-303, S. 85, 136; P.A. 79-423; 79-579; 79-631, S. 84, 111; P.A. 80-483, S. 121, 186; P.A. 82-181, S. 1, 2; P.A. 84-449, S. 5, 7; P.A. 93-91, S. 1, 2; 93-262, S. 1, 87; P.A. 95-238, S. 4; P.A. 96-246, S. 20, 21; P.A. 97-319, S. 19, 22; P.A. 98-185; 98-241, S. 5, 18; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1, S. 102, 121; P.A. 00-137, S. 2, 3, 15; P.A. 01-142, S. 6–8; 01-149, S. 1; 01-195, S. 37, 38, 181; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-2, S. 33, 69; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-9, S. 129, 131; May 9 Sp. Sess. P.A. 02-7, S. 29, 30; P.A. 03-243, S. 2; P.A. 06-102, S. 9; 06-196, S. 173; P.A. 07-159, S. 5; 07-174, S. 3; 07-203, S. 1; P.A. 09-185, S. 3; 09-194, S. 4; P.A. 10-26, S. 6; 10-43, S. 38; P.A. 11-51, S. 16; 11-116, S. 3; 11-180, S. 3; 11-240, S. 8; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-1, S. 269, 272, 273; P.A. 13-31, S. 29; 13-194, S. 5, 6; 13-228, S. 1; 13-234, S. 71, 72; P.A. 15-199, S. 3; P.A. 16-124, S. 3; P.A. 17-92, S. 2, 3; 17-237, S. 115; P.A. 18-58, S. 1; 18-67, S. 11; 18-186, S. 1, 2; P.A. 21-15, S. 117; 21-140, S. 5; P.A. 24-126, S. 5–7.) History: 1959 act specified that commissioner is to pay cost of child's care and maintenance and collect cost of care and maintenance from child's estate or income in Subsec. (d); 1967 act added “dependent child” to classification of children within section and added custody by private or public agency to Subsec. (c); 1969 act rephrased provisions and rearranged Subsecs., authorized filing in Subsec. (a) by town manager, local welfare department and commission on youth services, deleting authority for parent or guardian, Long Lane School and Connecticut State Farm for Women to file and added provisions in Subsec. (c) re physical and/or mental examinations of parents or guardians; 1971 acts authorized application by person who acknowledges paternity of a child born out of wedlock in Subsec. (f), added Subsec. (g) re surrender of child upon court order, rephrased provision in Subsec. (e) re recovery of costs of child's care and maintenance and specified in Subsec. (b) who may serve orders for temporary custody; 1972 acts changed age at which child's guardianship terminates from 21 to 18, reflecting changed age of majority, in Subsec. (d) and referred to annual rather than biennial budgets in Subsec. (e); P.A. 73-205 authorized court to order child's parent or person responsible for child to show cause why temporary custody should not be vested in suitable agency or person pending hearing and specified that hearing must be held within 10 days from issuance of order in Subsec. (b); P.A. 73-546 rephrased provision in Subsec. (e) re recovery of costs of child's care and maintenance; P.A. 73-625 extended period of guardianship until child is twenty-one where he is in full-time attendance in secondary or technical school, college or state-accredited job training program in Subsec. (d); P.A. 74-251 authorized commitments to commissioner of children and youth services after April 1, 1975, in Subsecs. (a) and (d); P.A. 75-420 replaced welfare commissioner with commissioner of social services generally; P.A. 75-492 deleted reference to welfare commissioner and authorized filing by child, his representative, attorney or foster parent in Subsec. (a); P.A. 75-602 applied provisions to youths, included in Subsec. (a) reference to “dependent” children and substituted children and youth services commissioner for welfare commissioner in Subsec. (c); P.A. 76-436 deleted references to superior court for references to juvenile court where appearing, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-272 added proviso in Subsec. (d) re conditions which must be met for out-of-state placements; P.A. 77-273 added Subsec. (h) re standing of foster parent; P.A. 77-614 and P.A. 78-303 replaced central collections division of finance and control department with department of administrative services in Subsec. (b) and, effective January 1, 1979, replaced references to social services commissioner with references to human resources commissioner; P.A. 78-223 specified commissioner in Subsec. (e) as commissioner “of the department to which the child or youth is committed”; P.A. 79-423 added exception in Subsec. (b) re payment of expenses of temporary care and custody by state agencies; P.A. 79-579 deleted reference to human resources commissioner in Subsec. (d), placed limitations on period of commitment in that Subsec., inserted new Subsec. (e) re procedure when expiration of commitment period is near to revoke or extend commitment or terminate parental rights, relettering former Subsecs. (e) to (h) accordingly, and amended Subsec. (i), formerly (h), to apply with regard to revocation of commitments; P.A. 79-631 and P.A. 80-483 made technical changes to reflect final deletion of extraneous references to commissioner of human resources; Sec. 17-62 temporarily renumbered as Sec. 51-310 and ultimately transferred to Sec. 46b-129 in 1979, and references to other sections within provisions revised as necessary by the Revisors to reflect their transfer; P.A. 82-181 amended Subsecs. (d) and (e) by reducing the maximum period of commitment from 2 years to 18 months; P.A. 84-449 amended Subsec. (a) by adding “except as otherwise provided in subsection (e) of section 17-43a”; P.A. 93-91 substituted commissioner and department of children and families for commissioner and department of children and youth services, effective July 1, 1993; P.A. 93-262 authorized substitution of commissioner and department of social services for commissioner and department of human resources, effective July 1, 1993; P.A. 95-238 amended Subsecs. (d) and (e) to change the maximum period of commitment from 18 months to 12 months and amended Subsec. (e) to require that the court determine the appropriateness of continued efforts to reunify the child or youth with his family; P.A. 96-246 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provision requiring court to provide commissioner and parent with specific steps for parent to facilitate return of child to custody of parent or maintain custody of child and amended Subsec. (g) by permitting attorney who represented child in prior or pending hearing, attorney appointed by Superior Court and attorney retained by child over fourteen to make application for revocation of commitment; P.A. 97-319 amended Subsec. (d) to add provision re court orders of steps the parent must take to facilitate return of a child or youth to the custody of the parent and provision re placement of siblings and alternatives to commitment, effective July 1, 1997; P.A. 98-185 amended Subsec. (i) by providing standing to foster parents to comment on the best interest of the child or youth; P.A. 98-241 substantially revised section, amending provisions re allegations of petition, preliminary hearing on ex parte custody order or hearing on petition, notice re rights of parents re hearing, consideration of placement of child in town where child resides, necessary steps for parent to regain custody of child, intervention by grandparents, and contested hearing on order of temporary custody, adding new Subsecs. (c) to (h), inclusive, and redesignating former Subsecs. (c), (d), (f), (h) and (i) as Subsecs. (i), (j), (l), (n) and (o); replaced former Subsec. (e) with new Subsec. (k) re filing of permanency plan and motion to extend or revoke commitment by Commissioner of Children and Families, basis for determination by court, and determination by court, and replaced former Subsec. (g) with new Subsec. (m) re motion to revoke commitment; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1 made technical changes in Subsec. (b), effective July 1, 1998; P.A. 00-137 changed reference in Subsec. (a) from Subsec. (d) to Subsec. (k) of Sec. 17a-112, made technical changes in Subsec. (d), and in Subsec. (e) deleted “and enter a default” after “order of temporary custody” and added Subsec. (k)(3)(F) providing that if permanency plan identifies adoption as option, thorough adoption assessment and child specific recruitment is required, and defining “thorough adoption assessment” and “child specific recruitment”, relettered former (F) as (G), and added provision to Subsec. (k)(3)(G) that at permanency plan hearing, court shall review status of child, progress made to implement permanency plan and determine timetable for attaining permanency plan, and deleted Subsec. (k)(4) re revocation of commitment by operation of law, following dismissal of termination petition, or denial of motion to transfer guardianship; P.A. 01-142 amended Subsec. (j) by deleting provisions re 12-month commitment period and extension, providing that commitment shall remain in effect until further order of the court pursuant to Subsec. (k), and making technical changes for purposes of gender neutrality, amended Subsec. (k) by changing review of permanency plan to 9 months after placement in custody of commissioner or removal of child or youth by order of court whichever is earlier, deleting former provisions re 10 and 12-month periods and extension, giving party 30 days to file motion in opposition to permanency plan or the maintaining or revocation of commitment and requiring hearing to be held within 90 days of filing motion, requiring evidentiary hearing re any contested motion, adding provisions re burden of proof and subsequent permanency hearings, requiring court to find by clear and convincing evidence that efforts to reunite child with parents is inappropriate, making child or youth's health and safety to be of paramount concern in formulating permanency plan, deleting provisions re thorough adoption assessment and child specific recruitment, requiring commissioner to document compelling reason why goals in Subdiv. (3)(A) to (D) are not in best interest of child, requiring permanency hearing to determine whether commissioner has made reasonable efforts to achieve permanency plan and making conforming and technical changes, amended Subsec. (o) by changing “standing” to “right to be heard” for foster parents in matters re placement or revocation of commitment of foster child; P.A. 01-149 added Subsec. (p) re right to be heard of sibling of child committed to Department of Children and Families concerning visitation with and placement of such child and re court guided by best interest of all siblings in awarding visitation or modifying placement; P.A. 01-195 made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (k), effective July 11, 2001; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-2 amended Subsec. (k) by adding provisions, designated as Subdiv. (5), thorough adoption assessment and child-specific recruitment; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-9 revised effective date of June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-2 but without affecting this section; May 9 Sp. Sess. P.A. 02-7 amended Subsec. (b) to add provision requiring the court upon issuance of order, or not later than 60 days thereafter, to make a determination whether the Department of Children and Families made reasonable efforts to keep the child or youth with his or her parents or guardian prior to the issuance of such order and, if such efforts were not made, whether such reasonable efforts were not possible considering the best interests of the child or youth and to make technical changes and amended Subsec. (j) to add provision requiring the court upon issuance of an order committing the child or youth to the Commissioner of Children and Families, or not later than 60 days thereafter, to make a determination whether the Department of Children and Families made reasonable efforts to keep the child or youth with his or her parents or guardian prior to the issuance of such order and, if such efforts were not made, whether such reasonable efforts were not possible considering the best interests of the child or youth and to make technical changes, effective August 15, 2002; P.A. 03-243 added Subsec. (q) re application of Secs. 17a-152 and 17a-175 to placements pursuant to section; P.A. 06-102 made technical changes, amended Subsec. (j) to delete reference to provisions of Subsec. (k) re order of the court, amended Subsec. (k)(1) to delete references to motion to maintain or revoke commitment, require that motion for review include reason therefor, and substitute burden of proving that permanency plan is in best interests of child or youth for burden of establishing that commitment should be maintained, deleted former Subsec. (k)(2) re court hearing on reunification, redesignated existing Subsec. (k)(3) to (5) as (k)(2) to (4), amended Subsec. (k)(2) to substitute “reunification” for “placement”, amended Subsec. (k)(3) to require court to determine services to be provided to parent if court approves permanency plan of reunification and timetable for services, delete provision re court to maintain commitment if in best interests of child or youth, and substitute “may” for “shall” re revocation of commitment, amended Subsec. (k)(4) to require commissioner to petition for termination of parental rights not later than 60 days after permanency plan of adoption is approved if petition not previously filed, amended Subsec. (m) to substitute “interests” for “interest and welfare”, and amended Subsec. (o) to reference motion for review of permanency plan (Revisor's note: In Subsec. (j), the word “youth” in the phrase “neglected, uncared-for or dependent children or youth” was replaced editorially by the Revisors with “youths” for consistency with P.A. 06-196); P.A. 06-196 made technical changes in Subsec. (l), effective June 7, 2006; P.A. 07-159 amended Subsec. (d) by adding provision re parent's or guardian's right to counsel pursuant to Sec. 46b-135(b) in Subdiv. (1) and references to Sec. 46b-123e(b) in Subdivs. (2) and (3) and by deleting “as determined by the court” in Subdiv. (3), effective July 1, 2007; P.A. 07-174 amended Subsec. (o) to apply provisions to prospective adoptive parents and relative caregivers, change right to notice and to be heard “on a motion for review of a permanency plan and in matters concerning the placement or revocation of commitment of a foster child” to “in any proceeding concerning a foster child living with such foster parent, prospective adoptive parent or relative caregiver”, and eliminate requirement that former foster parent must have cared for a child or youth for “not less than six months” in order to have right to be heard and comment on best interests of the child or youth; P.A. 07-203 amended Subsec. (l) by adding proviso limiting commissioner's ability to collect reimbursement from the estate of a child or youth for his or her care and maintenance and making a conforming change, effective July 10, 2007; P.A. 09-185 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provisions re placement of a child with person related by blood or marriage and re investigation of the suitability of placement with a relative, and by expanding notice to respondent on orders for a preliminary hearing re placement with a relative, deleted former Subsec. (c) re grandparent motion to intervene, redesignated existing Subsec. (d) as Subsec. (c) and amended same by adding Subdivs. (10) and (11) re court's responsibilities during a preliminary hearing re identification of relatives who might serve as foster parents or temporary custodians, added new Subsec. (d) re procedures for a relative to intervene in temporary custody or permanent guardianship proceeding, standard for granting motion to intervene, assessment of a relative granted intervenor status, requirements for a relative granted temporary custody and termination of a relative's intervenor status, amended Subsec. (f) by replacing “show cause” with “appear”, amended Subsec. (j) by replacing “care and personal custody” with “legal guardianship”, adding provisions re standard for awarding legal guardianship to a relative and inserting reference to persons related by marriage, amended Subsec. (k) by adding provision re ability of certain relatives to oppose a permanency plan and deleting reference to certified relative caregiver, and made conforming and technical changes, effective June 29, 2009; P.A. 09-194 added Subsec. (r) re notification to attorneys of record of department's motion to transfer a child or youth to out-of-state placement, effective October 1, 2010; P.A. 10-26 made technical changes in Subsec. (d)(1)(B) and (4), effective May 10, 2010; P.A. 10-43 amended Subsec. (c)(7) to authorize court to inquire of mother, under oath, as to identity and address of any person who might be the father of the child or youth; P.A. 11-51 amended Subsec. (c)(2) and (3) to substitute reference to Sec. 51-296a for reference to Sec. 46b-123e, and amended Subsec. (d) to substitute “office of Chief Public Defender” for “Chief Child Protection Attorney” and add Subdiv. (5) to provide that a relative granted intervenor status is not entitled to counsel, except as provided in Sec. 46b-136, effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 11-116 amended Subsec. (c)(10) by adding requirement that commissioner report to the court re placement with a relative; P.A. 11-180 amended Subsec. (q) by adding provision re placement of child or youth in another state; P.A. 11-240 amended Subsecs. (a) and (j) by replacing “dependent” with “abused”, effective July 1, 2011; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-1 amended Subsec. (c), in Subdiv. (8), to require clerk to send certified copy of paternity acknowledgment and affirmation to Department of Public Health for filing in paternity registry and maintain certified copy of same in court file and, in Subdiv. (9), to replace provisions re advising person named as father that he may have no further standing in proceedings re child and re execution of written denial of paternity with provisions re rebuttable presumption that named person is father based on genetic tests indicating 99% or greater probability of paternity and court finding evidence of sexual intercourse during time of conception, re court to issue judgment adjudicating paternity after providing father an opportunity for hearing, re clerk of court to send certified copy of judgment adjudicating paternity to Department of Public Health for filing in paternity registry, and re court to enter order that named person is not the biological father and remove him from case if genetic tests indicate he is not the biological father, amended Subsec. (d)(4) to delete “permanent” re guardianship, amended Subsec. (j) to insert Subdiv. designators (1) to (6), to define “permanent legal guardianship” in Subdiv. (1), to insert Subpara. designators (A) and (B) and add Subpara. (C) re vesting permanent legal guardianship and Subpara. (D) re placement in custody of parent or guardian with protective supervision in Subdiv. (2), to apply provisions to permanent legal guardianships in Subdiv. (3), to delete provision re placement in protective supervision in Subdiv. (4), to add Subdiv. (5) re notice to parent that parent may not file motion to terminate permanent legal guardianship and re factors to be proven by clear and convincing evidence prior to ordering permanent legal guardianship, and to add Subdiv. (6) re standards for reopening, modifying or terminating order of permanent legal guardianship, amended Subsec. (k) to add provision re credible hearsay evidence re party's compliance with specific court-ordered steps in Subdiv. (1) and to add reference to permanent legal guardianship in Subdiv. (2)(B), added new Subsec. (n) re petition to reinstate guardianship after a legal guardianship is ordered, redesignated existing Subsecs. (n) to (r) as Subsecs. (o) to (s), and made technical changes; P.A. 13-31 amended Subsec. (j)(4) to change “technical school” to “technical high school”, effective May 28, 2013; P.A. 13-194 amended Subsec. (c)(8) to require clerk to send original paternity acknowledgment, rather than a certified copy, to Department of Public Health, and maintain a copy, rather than a certified copy, and amended Subsec. (n) to substitute “motion” for “petition”; P.A. 13-228 amended Subsec. (b) by adding provisions re the rights and duties of a person or agency vested with the temporary care and custody of a child and making technical changes; P.A. 13-234 amended Subsec. (j) to delete provision re full-time attendance in secondary or technical school, college or job training program in Subdiv. (4), add new Subdiv. (5) re when youth who has reached age 18 may remain in the care of commissioner and redesignate existing Subdivs. (5) and (6) as Subdivs. (6) and (7), and amended Subsec. (k)(1) to add “if the child or youth has not reached his or her eighteenth birthday” re filing motion for review of permanency plan, add reference to Subsec. (j)(5) and add provision re youth over age 18 remaining in voluntary placement with department; P.A. 15-199 amended Subsec. (k) by designating existing provisions as Subpara. (A) and adding Subpara. (B) re permanency plan and permanency resource for a child at least 12 years of age in Subdiv. (1), by deleting former Subpara. (C) re long-term foster care with relative licensed as a foster parent, redesignating existing Subpara. (D) as Subpara. (C), redesignating existing Subpara. (E) as Subpara. (D) and adding “for a child sixteen years of age or older,” therein, and adding provision re inclusion of adult who has a significant relationship with the child re planned permanent living arrangement in Subdiv. (2), by adding new Subdivs. (3) and (5) re permanency plan for a child 16 years of age or older, by redesignating existing Subdivs. (3) and (4) as Subdivs. (4) and (6) and, in redesignated Subdiv. (4), adding provisions re child's or youth's desired permanency outcome, and by making technical changes, effective July 1, 2015; P.A. 16-124 amended Subsec. (j) by designating existing definition of “permanent legal guardianship” as Subpara. (A) and adding Subpara. (B) defining “caregiver” in Subdiv. (1), adding reference to caregiver in Subdiv. (6)(C)(ii) and making technical and conforming changes; P.A. 17-92 amended Subsec. (b)(vi) by replacing provision re commissioner where practicable to investigate relatives prior to preliminary hearing and provide report to court as to relative's suitability with provision re commissioner to investigate any relative proposed to serve as foster parent or temporary custodian prior to preliminary hearing and provide preliminary report to court as to relative's suitability and potential barriers to licensing as foster parent or granting temporary custody of child or youth to relative, and added Subsec. (t) re child or youth placed into out-of-home care and information commissioner is to include in any report submitted to court, effective July 1, 2017; P.A. 17-237 amended Subsec. (j)(4) by replacing “technical high school” with “technical education and career school”, effective July 1, 2017; P.A. 18-58 amended Subsec. (j)(4) by adding provision re commissioner to provide at least 10 days' notice of transfer to second or subsequent placement to child and child's attorney unless emergency or risk to child's well-being prevents such notice, effective July 1, 2018; P.A. 18-67 amended Subsec. (j)(1)(B) by redefining “caregiver”, effective July 1, 2018; P.A. 18-186 amended Subsec. (j)(4) by adding provisions re commissioner to provide placement information re child or youth to such child's or youth's attorney or guardian ad litem, amended Subsec. (k)(1)(B)(i) by adding provision re commissioner to provide not less than 5 days' advance written notice of any permanency team meeting re child's permanency plan to attorney or guardian ad litem appointed to represent the child, and made technical changes; P.A. 21-15 amended Subsec. (c)(7) by replacing “father” with “alleged genetic parent”, replacing “mother” with “birth parent” and making a technical change, amended Subsec. (c)(8) by replacing “father” with “alleged genetic parent”, replacing “mother” with “birth parent”, replacing “a paternity acknowledgment and affirmation” with “an acknowledgment of parentage”, replacing “paternity” with “parentage” and making technical changes, amended Subsec. (c)(9) by replacing “father” with “alleged genetic parent”, replacing provision re paternity determination in accordance with Sec. 46b-168 with parentage determination in accordance with the Connecticut Parentage Act, replacing “paternity” with “parentage” and making technical changes and amended Subsecs. (c)(10) and (11) by replacing “blood or marriage” with “blood, marriage or law”, effective January 1, 2022; P.A. 21-140 amended Subsec. (k)(1) by deleting former Subpara. (B)(iv) re submission of report on number of case plans in which children identified adults to serve as a permanency resource, effective July 7, 2021; P.A. 24-126 amended Subsec. (j) in Subdiv. (1) by adding Subpara. (C) defining “trial home visit”, adding new Subdiv. (3) re approval of permanency plan and authorization of trial home visit, redesignating existing Subdivs. (3) to (7) as Subdivs. (4) to (8), amended Subsec. (p) by adding provision re inclusion of Internet web site address in notice and requirement re confirmation of compliance by court, amended Subsec. (s) by designating existing provisions re notice to each attorney of record as Subdiv. (1) and adding Subdiv. (2) re notice to attorney and guardian ad litem, amended Subsec. (t) in Subdiv. (2) by changing “such child or youth's medical, dental, developmental, educational and treatment needs” to “whether the department has received or obtained the most recent information concerning such child's or youth's medical, dental, developmental, educational and treatment needs from any relevant service providers”, amended Subsec. (t) by adding Subdiv. (4) re screening and identification of delays and referral to birth-to-three program, Subdiv. (5) re dates of certain meetings, Subdiv. (6) re new report of abuse or neglect and Subdiv. (7) re new criminal charges and changing “well-being” to “best interests”, added Subsec. (u) re requirement concerning court, Subsec. (v) re requirement concerning Department of Children and Families, and Subsec. (w) re requirement concerning Department of Children and Families, and made technical and conforming changes throughout, effective July 1, 2024. Annotations to former sections 17-62 and 51-310: Foster parents are not parents for purposes of Subsec. (f). 171 C. 630. Cited. 4 CS 254. Youth and emotional instability of parents held not sufficient to warrant finding that child was uncared for or neglected. 21 CS 154. Cited. 26 CS 316; 33 CS 193. Annotations to present section: Cited. 177 C. 648; 179 C. 155; 187 C. 431; 188 C. 259; 190 C. 310; 192 C. 254. Confers exclusive jurisdiction on Superior Court to enter orders in cases in which there is finding that child or youth is uncared for, neglected or dependent upon filing of a neglect petition. 195 C. 344. Cited. 211 C. 151; 216 C. 563. Cannot be read together with Sec. 45a-717(f)(3) so as to permit the custody determination made under this section to lead directly to the termination determination made under Sec. 45a-717(f)(3); judgment in 25 CA 586 reversed. 223 C. 492. Cited. 224 C. 263; 230 C. 459; 238 C. 146. Temporary custody orders entered by Superior Court for juvenile matters pursuant to Subsecs. (a) and (b) are final judgments for purposes of appeal. 256 C. 383. Superior Court has exclusive jurisdiction when a neglect petition is filed pursuant to section; existence of a will appointing testamentary guardian does not deprive it of that jurisdiction. 260 C. 182. Superior Court for juvenile matters did not lose subject matter jurisdiction because the youth, who was seeking relief in the proceeding, attained the age of 18, except that Superior Court for juvenile matters lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the youth's claim under Subsec. (j) because the youth was over age of 18 and had not alleged factual predicate that he was in full-time attendance in a secondary school, training school, college or job training program. 297 C. 673. Noncustodial parent cannot be prohibited from entering a plea in a neglect proceeding if parent is seeking to contest the issue of whether the child was neglected; although section refers to “the parent” in the singular, it does not limit the giving of advice or the acceptance of a plea to custodial parents. 301 C. 245. Court lacks authority under section to adjudicate a person who has reached age 18 as neglected or uncared-for and to commit such person to the care of department, regardless of the fact that the petition was filed before such person reached age 18. 303 C. 569. Court lacks authority under section to adjudicate a person neglected or uncared-for and provide dispositional relief after the person reaches age 18. Id., 584. Cited. 1 CA 463; 6 CA 360; 8 CA 656; 9 CA 608; 13 CA 626; 19 CA 371; 22 CA 656; 26 CA 58; 29 CA 112; Id., 600; 31 CA 400; judgment reversed, see 230 C. 459; 33 CA 632; 35 CA 276; 45 CA 606. Right to family integrity is not absolute; state's intervention in family matters is justified when it is found that a child has been neglected or uncared for. 76 CA 693. Use of “shall” within statutory framework is directory and court did not lack jurisdiction. 87 CA 210. Neglect proceedings are comprised of two parts, adjudication and disposition. 132 CA 314. Read together with Sec. 46b-120, sections vest court with authority to enter interim orders that are in the best interests of children. 155 CA 624. Trial court's consideration of the age of the case in denying a motion to compel the department's provision of reunification services reflects the legislature's desire to shift the focus of juvenile proceedings from parental rights to the child's right to safety, stability, and permanency. 217 CA 330. Cited. 39 CS 514; 41 CS 23; Id., 145; Id., 505; 42 CS 562; 43 CS 108; 44 CS 235; Id., 551. Section does not govern termination of parental rights petitions. 47 CS 273. Subsec. (a): Authority to draft and sign petitions to terminate parental rights not limited to attorneys. 247 C. 1. Where commitment of children not contested, respondent parents not aggrieved and exhaustion of administrative remedies not required. 262 C. 155. Cited. 2 CA 705; 9 CA 98. Statute does not require that a respondent parent have custody for court to adjudicate a neglect petition. 51 CA 667. Subsec. (b): Held constitutional; burden of proof and standard of proof discussed. 189 C. 276. Adjudication of neglect may be based on potential risk of harm. 58 CA 119. Specific steps prescribed by court may not be interpreted as orders unto themselves from which the court may issue a contempt order. 64 CA 55. Court order of temporary custody on basis that children were in imminent danger supported by evidence including that mother was suicidal, threatened to hurt herself and others, claimed to possess a gun, was under the influence of alcohol, told children to lie about her identity and refused to answer door when help arrived. 120 CA 537. A finding of immediate physical danger is a prerequisite to entry of order under Subsec. granting temporary custody of a child in one other than the child's parents. 126 CA 493. An order of temporary custody issued pursuant to Subsec. necessarily suspends or interrupts a period of protective supervision such that a previously ordered period of protective supervision cannot expire and terminate the underlying neglect petition while the order of temporary custody is in place; trial court had ongoing jurisdiction to rule on the order of temporary custody even though no new neglect petition or motion to modify had been filed. 191 CA 397. Subsec. (c): Does not violate due process. 10 CA 428. Subsec. (e): “Shall” construed to be directory rather than mandatory. 9 CA 506. Cited. 23 CA 410. Department of Children and Families may petition for an extension of commitment pursuant to section even when petition to terminate parental rights is pending. 40 CA 366. Order of trial court extending commitment of minor child to commissioner is final judgment for purposes of appeal. 49 CA 361. Subsec. (g): Before a court may rely on the statutory hearsay exception to admit the challenged statements, the petitioner has the burden of establishing a “reasonably necessary” basis why the children should not be required to testify at a contested hearing, and “reasonably necessary” does not require unavailability as a prerequisite to the admission of a hearsay statement, instead, the court should consider a number of factors in light of the circumstances of the case before it. 213 CA 541. Subsec. (j): Trial court must both find and adjudicate on one of three distinct grounds prior to awarding custody of child to Department of Children and Families. 276 C. 146. Cited. 46 CA 69. Court's failure to order specific steps to facilitate reunification after a finding of neglect, although in error, did not preclude the termination of respondent's parental rights on the basis of abandonment pursuant to Sec. 17a-112(j). 111 CA 500. 18-year-old petitioner failed to establish factual predicate to allow court to commit petitioner to Department of Children and Families pursuant to Subsec. 125 CA 572; Id., 584. Subsec. is the basis on which the legislature intended a court to adjudicate a motion to transfer guardianship of a child or youth from Commissioner of Children and Families to an individual other than the parent or former guardian. 151 CA 820. Subsec. contains no presumption in favor of a parent; Sec. 46b-56b does not apply to proceeding under this section. 153 CA 599. A determination of whether a proposed guardian is a suitable and worthy caregiver is not required prior to proceeding to the best interests determination because a party seeking to transfer guardianship must satisfy both determination requirements. Id., 786. A court's disposition of neglect proceeding awarding custody and guardianship of child to one parent deprives the court of continuing jurisdiction over other parent's possible future reunification with child and requires the cessation of such reunification efforts. 165 CA 604. Subsec. (k): The approval or rejection of a permanency plan under section is not an appealable final judgment; the current statutory scheme for proposing permanency plans deals with future goals for custody of the child and there is nothing in the language of the section that would suggest that the court's authority to revoke commitment is any greater during a permanency hearing than it is at any other point during the proceedings and the respondent will not suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an immediate appeal. 221 CA 59. Subsec. (m): Because Subsec. directs the court to make two findings, first, that there no longer is a cause for commitment, and second, that revoking the commitment is in the child's best interest, Subsec. carries the implication that, at least when a motion for revocation of commitment is contested, an evidentiary hearing shall be held and the moving party must establish facts necessary to warrant revocation of the commitment. 297 C. 737. Because respondent parents have not exhausted their statutory remedy of moving to revoke commitment pursuant to section, court lacks jurisdiction over their claim. 66 CA 305. Notwithstanding trial court's failure to make express finding with respect to whether a cause for commitment remained for two minor children committed to custody of Commissioner of Children and Families, trial court's denial of respondent mother's motion to revoke the commitment was proper given its clear and unequivocal finding that it would be in the best interests of the children to remain with their foster parents. 93 CA 25. Trial court improperly revoked, sua sponte, child's commitment to Department of Children and Families and acted outside scope of its authority pursuant to section by opening judgment and revoking commitment without proper evidence, without giving notice to the parties and foster mother, and without giving foster mother opportunity to be heard as required by Subsec. (o). 98 CA 319. Moving party has burden to prove that cause for commitment no longer exists. 116 CA 83. Procedures set forth in Subsec. and Practice Book Sec. 35a-14A strike the appropriate balance between petitioner's and respondent's interests, and comply with the constitution's procedural due process requirements. Subsec. does not infringe on respondent's right to substantive due process because respondent was seeking to acquire custody of daughter from petitioner following daughter's commitment, rather than seeking to prevent interference with an existing and ongoing parent/child relationship. 183 CA 327. Procedures set forth in Subsec. and Practice Book Sec. 35a-14A strike the appropriate balance between petitioner's and respondent's interests, and comply with the constitution's procedural due process requirements. Subsec. does not infringe on respondent's right to substantive due process because respondent was seeking to acquire custody of daughter from petitioner following daughter's commitment, rather than seeking to prevent interference with an existing and ongoing parent/child relationship. 183 CA 327. Subsec. (n): A parent who has demonstrated that the reasons that led to the removal of that parent's guardianship rights have been resolved satisfactorily is constitutionally entitled to a presumption that reinstatement is in the best interests of the child, and this presumption applies when the current guardian is a nonparent, but does not apply in a dispute between two parents, and a nonparent must rebut this presumption by clear and convincing evidence. 213 CA 858.