Connecticut Statutes

§ 46a-95 — (Formerly Sec. 31-128). Enforcement by Superior Court of order of presiding officer.

Connecticut § 46a-95
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 46aHuman Rights
Ch. 814cHuman Rights and Opportunities

This text of Connecticut § 46a-95 ((Formerly Sec. 31-128). Enforcement by Superior Court of order of presiding officer.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-95 (2026).

Text

(a)The commission, through the Attorney General or a commission legal counsel, or the complainant may petition the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford, the judicial district where any discriminatory practice occurred or the judicial district in which any person charged with a discriminatory practice resides or transacts business for the enforcement of any order issued by a presiding officer under this chapter and for appropriate temporary relief of a restraining order.
(b)The commission shall certify and file in the court the order of the presiding officer as part of the commission's petition or upon order of the court.
(c)Within five days after filing a petition in court, the commission or the complainant shall (1) serve the petition by registered or certified mail to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Napoleon v. Xerox Corp.
656 F. Supp. 1120 (D. Connecticut, 1987)
10 case citations
Colon v. United States Postal Service
95 F. Supp. 2d 85 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
2 case citations

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 7407; 1963, P.A. 472; 1967, P.A. 715, S. 4; 1971, P.A. 870, S. 89; P.A. 76-436, S. 619, 681; P.A. 77-603, S. 124, 125; P.A. 78-280, S. 1, 127; P.A. 80-422, S. 43; 80-483, S. 92, 186; P.A. 83-496; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29, S. 35, 82; P.A. 88-241, S. 2; 88-317, S. 105, 107; P.A. 93-362, S. 5; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 195; P.A. 11-237, S. 12.) History: 1963 act authorized complainants to obtain review of order in superior court in Subsec. (d); 1967 act authorized commission counsel to petition court when respondent is a state agency or officer in Subsec. (a); 1971 act replaced superior court with court of common pleas in Subsec. (d), effective September 1, 1971, except that courts with cases pending retain jurisdiction unless pending matters deemed transferable; P.A. 76-436 added references to judicial districts in Subsecs. (a) and (d), added reference to Sec. 52-7 in Subsec. (c) and replaced court of common pleas with superior court in Subsec. (d), effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-603 replaced provisions re review of orders by court with provision requiring that appeals be made in accordance with Sec. 4-183, retaining venue as before and jurisdictional powers; P.A. 78-280 deleted references to counties; P.A. 80-422 restated and reorganized provisions, creating new Subsecs. (b) to (h) from provisions formerly included in Subsec. (a), redesignating former Subsecs. (c) to (f) accordingly, and deleting provision granting hearings precedence over all other matters before court; P.A. 80-483 made technical correction in Subsec. (d); Sec. 31-128 transferred to Sec. 46a-95 in 1981; P.A. 83-496 amended Subsec. (j) to authorize the commission to appeal a final order of a hearing officer; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29 substituted appellate court for supreme court in Subsec. (i); P.A. 88-241 amended Subsec. (d) to replace court authority to set aside any order with court authority to remand any order to the commission or hearing officer, amended Subsec. (e) to prohibit the court considering a defense that was not urged before the hearing officer or an objection or defense that was raised or could have been raised on appeal under Sec. 46a-94a, deleted Subsec. (j) re the appeal of a final order of a hearing officer to the superior court and Subsec. (k) re an automatic stay of enforcement of any order upon commencement of review proceedings, and relettered the remaining Subsec. accordingly; P.A. 88-317 substituted “presiding officer” for “hearing officer”, effective July 1, 1989, and applicable to all agency proceedings commencing on or after that date; P.A. 93-362 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting “or, where the respondent is an agency or officer of the state” and adding “or the complainant may” before “petition”; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6 amended Subsec. (a) to replace “the commission counsel” with “a commission legal counsel”, effective August 20, 2003; P.A. 11-237 amended Subsec. (a) by adding judicial district of Hartford, amended Subsec. (b) by replacing provision re transcript of entire record with “the order” and adding “as part of the commission's petition or upon order of the court”, amended Subsec. (c) by adding complainant as party who shall serve petition or file affidavit and adding provision re filing affidavit with the court, amended Subsec. (d) by deleting former Subdivs. (1) and (3), redesignating existing Subdiv. (2) as Subdiv. (1), adding new Subdiv. (2) re entering a decree, and adding provisions re remand by court, court retaining jurisdiction, court orders to comply, and awarding costs of enforcement, amended Subsec. (e) by deleting provision re failure to urge objection and adding provision re limit of petitions, deleted former Subsecs. (f) to (h), redesignated existing Subsec. (i) as Subsec. (f) and amended same by adding exception re remand ordered pursuant to Subsec. (d), deleting provision re review on appeal, and adding provision re appeal of final decree, redesignated existing Subsec. (j) as Subsec. (g) and amended same by deleting provision re determination upon transcript filed, and made technical changes. Annotations to former section 31-128: Substantial and competent evidence requires that evidence be such as would, in a jury trial, justify a refusal to direct a verdict. 140 C. 537. Cited. 153 C. 171. Substantial evidence means something more than a mere scintilla and must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established. Id., 652, 661. Substantial and competent evidence discussed. 163 C. 309, 327. Cited. 165 C. 318; 168 C. 26; 176 C. 88; Id., 291; Id., 533; 188 C. 44. Employee applicant not a necessary party on appeal; he can just set the statutory machinery in motion. 17 CS 96. “Substantial and competent evidence” discussed. Id., 99; 18 CS 129; 20 CS 172. Superior Court has jurisdiction to hear appeal from order dismissing complainant's complaint of discrimination against her. 28 CS 341. Annotations to present section: Cited. 195 C. 543; 196 C. 208; 207 C. 547; 211 C. 464. Cited. 3 CA 464; Id., 484; 4 CA 423; 5 CA 643; 15 CA 569.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 46a-95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/46a-95.