Connecticut Statutes

§ 46a-64c — Discriminatory housing practices prohibited. Disposition of complaints. Penalty.

Connecticut § 46a-64c
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 46aHuman Rights
Ch. 814cHuman Rights and Opportunities

This text of Connecticut § 46a-64c (Discriminatory housing practices prohibited. Disposition of complaints. Penalty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-64c (2026).

Text

(a)It shall be a discriminatory practice in violation of this section:
(1)To refuse to sell or rent after the making of a bona fide offer, or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, gender identity or expression, marital status, age, lawful source of income, familial status, status as a veteran or status as a victim of domestic violence.
(2)To discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith, because of race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, gender identity or expression, marital status, age, lawful source of income

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parris v. Delaney (In re Delaney)
504 B.R. 738 (D. Connecticut, 2014)
29 case citations
Pathways, Inc. v. Dunne
329 F.3d 108 (Second Circuit, 2003)
21 case citations
Parris v. Pappas
844 F. Supp. 2d 271 (D. Connecticut, 2012)
11 case citations
Matyasovszky v. Housing Authority of City of Bridgeport
226 F.R.D. 35 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
9 case citations
Valley Housing Lp v. City of Derby
802 F. Supp. 2d 359 (D. Connecticut, 2011)
6 case citations
Robinson v. Gorman
145 F. Supp. 2d 201 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
3 case citations
Viens v. America Empire Surplus Lines Ins.
113 F. Supp. 3d 555 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
2 case citations
Pathways, Inc. v. Dunne
172 F. Supp. 2d 357 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
2 case citations
Russo v. Comm'n on Human Rights, No. Cv-H 8809-2953 Eh (Mar. 10, 1991)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 2144 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1991)
Rutka v. Meriden
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
McNeil v. Yale University
(D. Connecticut, 2020)
Poteat v. Hartford Housing
(D. Connecticut, 2023)

Legislative History

(P.A. 90-246, S. 5; P.A. 91-407, S. 1, 42; P.A. 92-257, S. 2; P.A. 07-217, S. 168; P.A. 11-55, S. 26, 27; P.A. 12-80, S. 95; P.A. 17-127, S. 6; P.A. 22-82, S. 14.) History: P.A. 91-407 added references to “learning disability” (Revisor's note: In Subsec. (a)(4)(B), numeric indicators within Subpara. (B) were changed editorially by the Revisors to lower case Roman numerals for consistency with usage elsewhere in section); P.A. 92-257 amended Subsec. (b) by adding “single-family” before “dwelling” and “unit” after “dwelling”, adding “to the extent they utilize shared bathroom facilities when such sleeping accommodations are” after “sleeping accommodations” and adding phrase “based on considerations of privacy and modesty”; P.A. 07-217 made a technical change in Subsec. (g), effective July 12, 2007; P.A. 11-55 amended Subsecs. (a) and (e) to add references to gender identity or expression; P.A. 12-80 amended Subsec. (g) to replace penalty of a fine of not less than $25 or more than $100 or imprisonment of not more than 30 days or both with a class D misdemeanor; P.A. 17-127 amended Subsecs. (a) and (e) to add “status as a veteran”, and make technical changes; P.A. 22-82 amended Subsec. (a)(1) by adding “status as a victim of domestic violence” and by making technical changes. In light of the nondiscriminatory purpose for which statute was enacted, a landlord may not rely solely on section 8 eligibility as basis for turning potential tenants away nor may it apply more stringent income requirements to section 8 rental applicants than to other rental applicants; federal law does not preempt statute; federal statute has no express preemption clause, does not occupy the field so comprehensively as to prohibit states from acting in the arena of low income housing assistance, and state program advances remedial purpose of the federal law; allowing an exception to antidiscrimination provisions for those landlords who refuse to use required section 8 lease would eviscerate the basic protection envisioned by statute. 250 C. 763. A violation of Subsec. (a)(3) does not require discriminatory animus, nor does it require a rejection of or disfavoring a lawful source of income, it bars statements that a reasonable listener would understand to convey an intention to make any such “preference, limitation, or discrimination”. 343 C. 31. Cited. 45 CA 1. Subsec. (b): Exception provided in Subdiv. (5) for insufficient income affords a landlord opportunity to determine whether, for reasons extrinsic to the section 8 housing assistance, a potential tenant lacks income sufficient to assure that rent will be paid promptly and other obligations of tenancy will be met. 250 C. 763. Subsec. (f): Trial court improperly granted defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, there being no evidence that legislature, in imposing time limitation in Subsec., intended for time limitation to serve as a jurisdictional bar; although use of “shall” reflected legislature's intent to have commission fulfill its obligation to investigate and issue final determination within time limitation set forth in Subsec., that obligation must be read in conjunction with statutory proviso “unless it is impracticable to do so”, an indication of legislature's intention to provide a condition under which commission's noncompliance is excused. 273 C. 373.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 46a-64c, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/46a-64c.