Connecticut Statutes

§ 42-179 — New motor vehicle warranties. Leased vehicles. Resales. Transfers. Manufacturer buybacks. Fine. Hearing. Regulations.

Connecticut § 42-179
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 42Business, Selling, Trading and Collection Practices
Ch. 743bNew Automobile Warranties

This text of Connecticut § 42-179 (New motor vehicle warranties. Leased vehicles. Resales. Transfers. Manufacturer buybacks. Fine. Hearing. Regulations.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-179 (2026).

Text

(a)As used in this chapter:
(1)“Consumer” means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle, a lessee of a motor vehicle, any person to whom such motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to such motor vehicle, and any person entitled by the terms of such warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty; and (2) “Motor vehicle” means a passenger motor vehicle, a passenger and commercial motor vehicle or a motorcycle, as defined in section 14-1 , which is sold or leased in this state.
(b)If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer during the period of two years following the date of origin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Motors Corporation v. Garito, No. Cv-97-0572553 (Dec. 11, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13083 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Ford Motor Company v. McMillian, No. Cv94 04 87 23s (Jan. 25, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 389-L (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)

Legislative History

(P.A. 82-287; P.A. 83-351, S. 1; 83-458; P.A. 84-338, S. 3, 8; 84-429, S. 75; P.A. 85-331, S. 1, 6; 85-613, S. 132, 154; P.A. 87-342, S. 1, 5; 87-522, S. 2, 6; P.A. 89-173, S. 1, 2; P.A. 92-190; P.A. 93-435, S. 14, 95; P.A. 97-6; P.A. 98-211, S. 2; P.A. 21-37, S. 41; P.A. 22-70, S. 14.) History: P.A. 83-351 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that the definitions therein also apply to Sec. 42-180; P.A. 83-458 amended Subsec. (c) by prohibiting manufacturers from holding dealers liable for refunds or vehicle replacements under certain circumstances; P.A. 84-338 created a period during which a consumer may require a manufacturer or dealer to repair a nonconformity existing in a new motor vehicle sold on or after July 1, 1984, outlined requirements concerning notifying the manufacturer of a nonconformity, specified the elements included in a refund of the contract price, required that a replacement vehicle be acceptable to the consumer, defined a defect as anything which impairs the use, safety or value of the vehicle, redefined the amount deducted for reasonable allowance for use, required disclosure that any vehicle which requires refund or replacement and which is being resold has been returned, and established that a manufacturer's informal dispute resolution procedure must comply with Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations Part 703 as in effect on October 1, 1982; P.A. 84-429 made technical changes for statutory consistency; P.A. 85-331 amended Subsec. (i) by specifying that a manufacturer's informal dispute resolution procedure must be certified by Attorney General as complying with Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 703, as in effect on October 1, 1982, and with the provisions of Subsec. (b) of Sec. 42-182, or order to come within the provision of this section; P.A. 85-613 made technical changes in Subsec. (e); P.A. 87-342 extended the provisions of the section to leased vehicles, removed obsolete language and made technical changes; P.A. 87-522 amended Subsecs. (b) and (e) by removing archaic language and making other technical changes, inserted a new Subsec. (f) concerning motor vehicles which have a nonconformity which results in a condition which is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven, relettered the remaining existing Subsecs. and amended the relettered Subsec. (g) by requiring a manufacturer who accepts the return of a motor vehicle due to a defect or nonconformity to notify the department of motor vehicles; P.A. 89-173 amended Subsec. (e) to require at least one repair attempt prior to making of a claim and amended Subsec. (g) to require persons other than manufacturers to make disclosures and to provide for regulations by the commissioner of motor vehicles concerning the format, nature and time period of information required; P.A. 92-190 amended Subsec. (g) to make chapter apply to “transferred” vehicles and to specify that the required written disclosure “shall be affixed to the motor vehicle and shall be included in any contract for sale or lease”, dividing Subsec. into Subdivs. and adding provisions designated as Subdiv. (2) which, among other things, provided for the stamping of the words “manufacturer buyback” on the original title of any buyback vehicle and added Subdiv. (4) specifying applicability to vehicles returned in another state because of nonconformity or defect and subsequently sold in this state; P.A. 93-435 reinstated language last printed in the 1991 revision, but dropped in the 1993 revision due to a clerical error, effective June 28, 1993; P.A. 97-6 amended the definition of “motor vehicle” in Subsec. (a) to include a motorcycle as defined in Sec. 14-1; P.A. 98-211 amended Subsecs. (b) and (e) by changing 18,000 miles to 24,000 miles and amended Subsec. (d) by changing the fraction denominator from 100,000 to 120,000; P.A. 21-37 amended Subsec. (d) by replacing reference to Sec. 42a-2-715 with “, if applicable”, adding provisions re what incidental damages include and making technical changes, amended Subsec. (g) by adding reference to motor vehicle subject to complaint under this chapter, replacing reference to Subsec. (g)(1) with reference to arbitration award or settlement, replacing “MANUFACTURER BUYBACK” with “MANUFACTURER BUYBACK-LEMON”, replacing “within ten days of” with “not later than thirty days after” and making a technical change in Subdiv. (2), adding provision re manufacturer to stamp title in Subdiv. (3), and adding Subdiv. (5) re fine for failure to stamp title and request for hearing, and added Subsec. (k) authorizing adoption of regulations; P.A. 22-70 amended Subsec. (d) by dividing existing provisions into Subdivs. (1) to (4) and redesignating existing Subdivs. (1) to (4) as Subdivs. (1)(A) to (D), existing Subdivs. (4)(A) to (D) as Subdivs. (2)(A) to (D) and existing Subdivs. (4)(A)(i) and (ii) as Subdivs. (4)(A) and (B), amended Subsec. (e) by dividing existing provisions into Subdivs. (1) to (3) and redesignating existing Subdivs. (1) and (2) as Subdivs. (1)(A) and (B), and made technical and conforming changes (Revisor's note: The word “Such” appearing before “two-year period” in the former langauge of Subsec. (e)(2) was removed editorially by the Revisors to conform with changes made by P.A. 22-70). Cited. 203 C. 63; 209 C. 579; 212 C. 83. Motorcycles fall within definition of “motor vehicle”. 40 CS 156. Subsec. (a): Subdiv. (2): Motorcycles are not passenger motor vehicles within meaning of section. 239 C. 1. Subsec. (d): Cited. 213 C. 136. Standard for determining whether a defect substantially impairs the use, safety or value of a motor vehicle to the consumer is both subjective and objective. 247 C. 274. Legislature did not intend to waive sovereign immunity under Subsec. to permit manufacturer of defective motor vehicles to claim reimbursement of sales tax refunded to consumers under state lemon law; plaintiff manufacturer not an aggrieved taxpayer entitled to reimbursement of refunded tax under Sec. 12-422 or 12-425; because plaintiff did not seek declaratory or injunctive relief for claims of violation of due process and equal protection rights, plaintiff's claims must be characterized as claims for damages and are barred by sovereign immunity. 284 C. 701. Certain transmission noise in plaintiff's car did not substantially impair its use, safety or value within meaning of statute. 80 CA 146. Subsec. (e): Plaintiff's attempt to replace truck's hood constituted a reasonable number of repair attempts as required by Subsec. 247 C. 274.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 42-179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/42-179.