Connecticut Statutes
§ 42-133e — Franchises: Definitions.
Connecticut § 42-133e
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 42Business, Selling, Trading and Collection Practices
Ch. 739Trading Stamps, Mail Orders, Franchises, Credit Programs and Subscriptions
This text of Connecticut § 42-133e (Franchises: Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-133e (2026).
Text
As used in sections 42-133e to 42-133g, inclusive:
(a)“Person” means a natural person, corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity and, in case of an entity, includes any other entity which has a majority interest in such entity or effectively controls such other entity as well as the individual officers, directors and other persons in active control of the activities of such entity;
(b)“Franchise” means an oral or written agreement or arrangement in which (1) a franchisee is granted the right to engage in the business of offering, selling or distributing goods or services under a marketing plan or system prescribed in substantial part by a franchisor, provided nothing contained herein shall be deemed to create a franchisor-franchisee relationship between the gran
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grand Light & Supply Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Honeywell, Inc., Micro Switch, Cross-Appellees
771 F.2d 672 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.
63 F.3d 1169 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Bailey Employment System, Inc. v. Hahn
545 F. Supp. 62 (D. Connecticut, 1982)
Chem-Tek, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
816 F. Supp. 123 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
McKeown Distributors, Inc. v. Gyp-Crete Corp.
618 F. Supp. 632 (D. Connecticut, 1985)
Sorisio v. Lenox, Inc.
701 F. Supp. 950 (D. Connecticut, 1988)
David Poriss v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc.
685 F.2d 56 (Second Circuit, 1982)
Belfiore v. New York Times Co.
654 F. Supp. 842 (D. Connecticut, 1986)
Hydro Air of Connecticut, Inc. v. Versa Technologies, Inc.
599 F. Supp. 1119 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
Broadhurst v. Steamtronics Corp.
48 B.R. 801 (D. Connecticut, 1985)
Rudel MacHinery Co. v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.
68 F. Supp. 2d 118 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Lyons v. Mobil Oil Corp.
554 F. Supp. 199 (D. Connecticut, 1982)
Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc.
13 F.4th 204 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Stodolink v. Yankee Barn Homes, Inc.
574 F. Supp. 557 (D. Connecticut, 1983)
Grand Light & Supply Co. v. Honeywell, Inc.
80 F.R.D. 699 (D. Connecticut, 1978)
Retail Service Associates v. Conagra Pet Products Co.
759 F. Supp. 976 (D. Connecticut, 1991)
Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.
853 F. Supp. 55 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
Charts v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
397 F. Supp. 2d 357 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
Hartford Electric Sup. v. Allen-Bradley Co., No. Cv 96562061s (May 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5074 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Stetzer v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.
87 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
Legislative History
(1972, P.A. 287, S. 1; P.A. 73-500, S. 1; P.A. 75-560, S. 1; P.A. 95-79, S. 161, 189.) History: P.A. 73-500 redefined “franchise” to delete reference to agreements or arrangements “for a definite or indefinite period”; P.A. 75-560 redefined “franchise”, “franchisor” and “franchisee” to include specific references to manufacturers, refiners, producers, distributors, wholesalers, jobbers and retailers; P.A. 95-79 redefined “person” to include a limited liability company, effective May 31, 1995. Cited. 179 C. 471. Cited. 1 CA 439. Subdiv. (b): Since plaintiff's business was not “substantially associated” with a trademark of defendant, no franchise arrangement existed under pre-1975 statute. 180 C. 720. Parties' actions, in addition to terms of written agreement, held to constitute an agreement or arrangement for purposes of determining whether a franchise exists; “substantial” association of franchisee with franchisor for purposes of section does not mean exclusive or complete association. 250 C. 334. Cited. 38 CS 495. Subdiv. (c): Defendant, a wholesaler, distributor and jobber of gasoline and petroleum products, was not a franchisor under pre-1975 statute since plaintiff's business was not “substantially associated” with a trademark of defendant. 180 C. 720.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 42-103aaa
Books and records.§ 42-103b
Definitions.§ 42-103cc
Short title: Time Share Act.§ 42-103ccc
Time share resale disclosure requirements.§ 42-103dd
Definitions.§ 42-103e
Contents of listing.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 42-133e, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/42-133e.