Connecticut Statutes

§ 42-133e — Franchises: Definitions.

Connecticut § 42-133e
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 42Business, Selling, Trading and Collection Practices
Ch. 739Trading Stamps, Mail Orders, Franchises, Credit Programs and Subscriptions

This text of Connecticut § 42-133e (Franchises: Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-133e (2026).

Text

As used in sections 42-133e to 42-133g, inclusive:

(a)“Person” means a natural person, corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other entity and, in case of an entity, includes any other entity which has a majority interest in such entity or effectively controls such other entity as well as the individual officers, directors and other persons in active control of the activities of such entity;
(b)“Franchise” means an oral or written agreement or arrangement in which (1) a franchisee is granted the right to engage in the business of offering, selling or distributing goods or services under a marketing plan or system prescribed in substantial part by a franchisor, provided nothing contained herein shall be deemed to create a franchisor-franchisee relationship between the gran

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.
63 F.3d 1169 (Second Circuit, 1995)
86 case citations
Bailey Employment System, Inc. v. Hahn
545 F. Supp. 62 (D. Connecticut, 1982)
33 case citations
Chem-Tek, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
816 F. Supp. 123 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
23 case citations
McKeown Distributors, Inc. v. Gyp-Crete Corp.
618 F. Supp. 632 (D. Connecticut, 1985)
20 case citations
Sorisio v. Lenox, Inc.
701 F. Supp. 950 (D. Connecticut, 1988)
17 case citations
David Poriss v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc.
685 F.2d 56 (Second Circuit, 1982)
16 case citations
Belfiore v. New York Times Co.
654 F. Supp. 842 (D. Connecticut, 1986)
15 case citations
Hydro Air of Connecticut, Inc. v. Versa Technologies, Inc.
599 F. Supp. 1119 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
11 case citations
Broadhurst v. Steamtronics Corp.
48 B.R. 801 (D. Connecticut, 1985)
10 case citations
Rudel MacHinery Co. v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.
68 F. Supp. 2d 118 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
7 case citations
Lyons v. Mobil Oil Corp.
554 F. Supp. 199 (D. Connecticut, 1982)
7 case citations
Mujo v. Jani-King International, Inc.
13 F.4th 204 (Second Circuit, 2021)
7 case citations
Stodolink v. Yankee Barn Homes, Inc.
574 F. Supp. 557 (D. Connecticut, 1983)
5 case citations
Grand Light & Supply Co. v. Honeywell, Inc.
80 F.R.D. 699 (D. Connecticut, 1978)
5 case citations
Retail Service Associates v. Conagra Pet Products Co.
759 F. Supp. 976 (D. Connecticut, 1991)
5 case citations
Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.
853 F. Supp. 55 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
5 case citations
Charts v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
397 F. Supp. 2d 357 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
4 case citations
Hartford Electric Sup. v. Allen-Bradley Co., No. Cv 96562061s (May 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5074 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
2 case citations
Stetzer v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.
87 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
2 case citations

Legislative History

(1972, P.A. 287, S. 1; P.A. 73-500, S. 1; P.A. 75-560, S. 1; P.A. 95-79, S. 161, 189.) History: P.A. 73-500 redefined “franchise” to delete reference to agreements or arrangements “for a definite or indefinite period”; P.A. 75-560 redefined “franchise”, “franchisor” and “franchisee” to include specific references to manufacturers, refiners, producers, distributors, wholesalers, jobbers and retailers; P.A. 95-79 redefined “person” to include a limited liability company, effective May 31, 1995. Cited. 179 C. 471. Cited. 1 CA 439. Subdiv. (b): Since plaintiff's business was not “substantially associated” with a trademark of defendant, no franchise arrangement existed under pre-1975 statute. 180 C. 720. Parties' actions, in addition to terms of written agreement, held to constitute an agreement or arrangement for purposes of determining whether a franchise exists; “substantial” association of franchisee with franchisor for purposes of section does not mean exclusive or complete association. 250 C. 334. Cited. 38 CS 495. Subdiv. (c): Defendant, a wholesaler, distributor and jobber of gasoline and petroleum products, was not a franchisor under pre-1975 statute since plaintiff's business was not “substantially associated” with a trademark of defendant. 180 C. 720.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 42-133e, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/42-133e.