Connecticut Statutes

§ 4-184a — Award of reasonable fees and expenses to certain prevailing parties in appeals of agency decisions.

Connecticut § 4-184a
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 4Management of State Agencies
Ch. 54Uniform Administrative Procedure Act

This text of Connecticut § 4-184a (Award of reasonable fees and expenses to certain prevailing parties in appeals of agency decisions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-184a (2026).

Text

(a)For the purposes of this section:
(1)“Person” means a person as defined in section 4-166 , but excludes (A) an individual with a net worth in excess of five hundred thousand dollars, (B) a business whose gross revenues for the most recently completed fiscal year exceeded one million five hundred thousand dollars, (C) a business with more than twenty-five employees and (D) an agency as defined in section 4-166 .
(2)“Reasonable fees and expenses” means any expenses not in excess of seven thousand five hundred dollars which the court finds were reasonably incurred in opposing the agency action, including court costs, expenses incurred in administrative proceedings, attorney's fees, witness fees of all necessary witnesses, and such other expenses as were reasonably incurred.
(b)In any a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. Freedom of Information Commn., No. Cv 00 0501326s (Aug. 2, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9512 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Burke v. State. O. Conn. Dep. of Soc. S., No. Cv-97-0543257 (Feb. 22, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 2221 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Skindzier v. Commissioner of Social Services, No. 0501376 (Jan. 4, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 119 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Stosuy v. Board of Selectman, No. Cv 99 70569 S (Mar. 20, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3011 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Hawks v. Reznik, No. Cv94-0119515s (Jan. 11, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 676 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Bradford v. Kimmerle, No. 113078 (Jan. 10, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 329 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Hawks v. Reznik, No. Cv94-0119515s (Jan. 7, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 2058 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)

Legislative History

(P.A. 83-284; P.A. 88-317, S. 26, 107; P.A. 97-88.) History: P.A. 88-317 added Subsec. (a)(1)(D), excluding an agency from definition of “person”, effective July 1, 1989, and applicable to all agency proceedings commencing on or after that date; P.A. 97-88 amended Subsec. (b) to require a prevailing party seeking an award of reasonable fees and expenses to file a request therefor within 30 days of the issuance of the court's decision. Cited. 204 C. 17; Id., 672; 214 C. 505; 216 C. 85; 237 C. 28. Cited. 18 CA 13; 30 CA 720; 38 CA 506; 43 CA 39; 45 CA 543. Subsec. (b): Cited. 240 C. 141. Agency action must be entirely unreasonable or without any reasonable basis in law or fact. 249 C. 693. Department of Social Services' actions were not entirely unreasonable where department made a good faith interpretation of the legislative mandate to minimize financial risk to Medicaid program. 258 C. 642. Cited. 26 CA 326; 41 CA 866. Agency's action must be entirely unreasonable or without any reasonable basis in law or fact to prevail. 51 CA 96. Trial court abused discretion in not awarding attorneys' fees under section because agency had no fewer than three opportunities to take appropriate action and thus there was no substantial justification for its failure to act. 75 CA 142.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 4-184a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/4-184a.