Stosuy v. Board of Selectman, No. Cv 99 70569 S (Mar. 20, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Stosuy v. Board of Selectman, No. Cv 99 70569 S (Mar. 20, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3011

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 20, 2000

DocketNo. CV 99 70569 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3011 (Stosuy v. Board of Selectman, No. Cv 99 70569 S (Mar. 20, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stosuy v. Board of Selectman, No. Cv 99 70569 S (Mar. 20, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3011 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Following the granting of its Motion to Dismiss the defendant has moved for an award of counsel fees as authorized by Connecticut General Statutes § 4-184a. CT Page 3012

After hearing and review of the briefs filed by counsel, the Court concludes, in its discretion, that attorney's fees should not be awarded in this case. Although the Motion to Dismiss was granted, the cause of action is not necessarily meritless and the plaintiff may employ other options to seek redress. This may well be only a preliminary skirmish in the overall battle. But, in any event, the Court does not believe the circumstances of this case warrant the award of attorney's fees and the defendants request is denied.

Klaczak, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Following the granting of its Motion to Dismiss the defendant has moved for an award of counsel fees as authorized by Connecticut General Statutes § 4-184a. CT Page 3012

After hearing and review of the briefs filed by counsel, the Court concludes, in its discretion, that attorney's fees should not be awarded in this case. Although the Motion to Dismiss was granted, the cause of action is not necessarily meritless and the plaintiff may employ other options to seek redress. This may well be only a preliminary skirmish in the overall battle. But, in any event, the Court does not believe the circumstances of this case warrant the award of attorney's fees and the defendants request is denied.

Klaczak, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 3011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stosuy-v-board-of-selectman-no-cv-99-70569-s-mar-20-2000-connsuperct-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack