Connecticut Statutes

§ 4-176 — Declaratory rulings. Petitions. Regulations.

Connecticut § 4-176
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 4Management of State Agencies
Ch. 54Uniform Administrative Procedure Act

This text of Connecticut § 4-176 (Declaratory rulings. Petitions. Regulations.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-176 (2026).

Text

(a)Any person may petition an agency, or an agency may on its own motion initiate a proceeding, for a declaratory ruling as to the validity of any regulation, or the applicability to specified circumstances of a provision of the general statutes, a regulation, or a final decision on a matter within the jurisdiction of the agency.
(b)Each agency shall adopt regulations, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, that provide for (1) the form and content of petitions for declaratory rulings, (2) the filing procedure for such petitions and (3) the procedural rights of persons with respect to the petitions.
(c)Within thirty days after receipt of a petition for a declaratory ruling, an agency shall give notice of the petition to all persons to whom notice is required by any provision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Brewers Ass'n v. Healy
669 F. Supp. 543 (D. Connecticut, 1987)
5 case citations
FRESH START SUBSTANCE SERVICES, LLC v. Galvin
599 F. Supp. 2d 279 (D. Connecticut, 2009)
3 case citations
Sprint PCS L.P. v. Connecticut Siting Council
222 F.3d 113 (Second Circuit, 2000)
3 case citations
Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Comcast Phone of Connecticut, Inc.
718 F.3d 53 (Second Circuit, 2013)
3 case citations
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Healy
849 F.2d 753 (Second Circuit, 1988)
1 case citations
Connecticut Medical Soc. v. Comm'ns on Hosp., No. 322810 (Aug. 12, 1991)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 7393 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1991)
Abc v. Conn. State Ethics Commission, No. Cv00-0504071s (Oct. 11, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13223 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
American Medical Response v. Efk of Connecticut, No. 451495 (Jun. 27, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 8719 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Town, W. Hartford v. Comm. on Human R., No. Cv 00-0598747-S (Jul. 11, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 8489 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Connecticut Asso., Bds., E. v. Tirozzi, No. Cv-89-0355498-S (Sep. 26, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 10077 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Orsi v. Senatore, No. 750239 (Aug. 26, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 8627 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
MacDermid v. Environmental Prot. Dept., No. Cv 98-0492628s (Apr. 3, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4249 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Abc v. State Ethics Commission of Ct, No. Cv 00 0504071 S (Dec. 12, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16372 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
United Auto Brokers, Inc. v. Pac
414 F. Supp. 149 (D. Connecticut, 1975)

Legislative History

(1971, P.A. 854, S. 11; P.A. 73-620, S. 8, 19; P.A. 82-349, S. 3, 4; 82-472, S. 178, 183; P.A. 88-317, S. 10, 107.) History: P.A. 73-620 made issuance of declaratory rulings discretionary and made provision for procedure if agency fails to issue ruling if requested to do so; P.A. 82-349 added provision re appeals pursuant to Secs. 4-175 and 4-183; P.A. 82-472 made a technical change, replacing appeal with remedy consisting of action for declaratory judgment; P.A. 88-317 substituted new provisions for the entire former section, effective July 1, 1989, and applicable to all agency proceedings commencing on or after that date. Cited. 169 C. 344; 171 C. 691; 172 C. 263; 173 C. 352; 177 C. 356; 178 C. 586; 183 C. 67; Id., 76; 186 C. 153; 191 C. 173; 192 C. 460; 194 C. 165; 197 C. 91; Id., 554; 199 C. 609; 200 C. 133; 203 C. 295; 204 C. 137; 208 C. 663; Id., 709; 210 C. 349; Id., 531; 213 C. 184; 214 C. 256; Id., 726; 215 C. 616; 216 C. 253; 217 C. 130; 218 C. 335; 221 C. 422; 222 C. 414; 223 C. 450; 226 C. 792; 227 C. 545; 234 C. 424; 236 C. 681; 239 C. 32; Id., 124; Id., 599. The expansive right to petition for a declaratory ruling under section does not confer an automatic right to appeal under Sec. 4-183 which requires that the person appealing demonstrate aggrievement. 286 C. 698. A letter, that meets all of the characteristics of a request for a declaratory ruling, to a state agency by a person seeking a determination re the applicability of a statute to specific facts, may be treated as a petition for a declaratory ruling even if the author of the letter does not expressly invoke section; state agency's letter in response constituted a declaratory ruling; under the circumstances, declaratory judgment action may be treated as an administrative appeal under Sec. 4-183. 307 C. 470. Expansive right for any person to seek a declaratory ruling, and subsequent denial of the request, do not confer a right to appeal under Sec. 4-183 without pleading sufficient facts to show aggrievement. 312 C. 265. Declaratory judgment procedures under section and Sec. 4-175 may not be used to bypass obligation to exhaust remedies in context of pending administrative proceeding; issuance of second chance notice under Sec. 4-182(c) does not on its own constitute institution of agency proceedings that would give plaintiff access to administrative remedy. 315 C. 196. Cited. 1 CA 1; 2 CA 68; 4 CA 117; 5 CA 253; 6 CA 723; 17 CA 17; judgment reversed, see 212 C. 570; 21 CA 629; Id., 678; 31 CA 400; judgment reversed, see 230 C. 459; 34 CA 123; 37 CA 653; judgment reversed, see 238 C. 361; 41 CA 827; 42 CA 631; 43 CA 133; 45 CA 83. In order to constitute a petition for declaratory judgment, plaintiff's e-mail correspondence with department needed to set forth specific circumstances and seek to have department apply a regulation, statute or final decision, on a matter in its jurisdiction, to those specific circumstances. 128 CA 777. Jurisdictional challenges are within the purview of administrative agency and there exists no broad exception to the exhaustion requirement for challenges to the jurisdiction of an administrative agency; plaintiff was obligated to raise its challenge to the jurisdiction of the commission in the pending administrative proceedings and, if necessary, an appeal pursuant to Sec. 4-183 or a subsequent declaratory petition pursuant to this section. 180 CA 478. Court properly dismissed complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs sought a declaratory ruling on the Commissioner of Education's application of the criteria set forth in Sec. 10-264 l (m) authorizing the board of education to charge tuition to suburban school districts and failed to exhaust the available administrative process under this section. 191 CA 360. Challenge to regulation should begin with petition under section; adverse ruling is appealable under Sec. 4-183 and failure to issue ruling permits action under Sec. 4-175. 32 CS 153. Cited. 33 CS 86; 39 CS 99; Id., 462; 40 CS 381; 44 CS 1.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 4-176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/4-176.