Connecticut Statutes

§ 30-86 — Sale or delivery to minors, intoxicated persons and habitual drunkards prohibited. Exceptions. Use of transaction scan devices. Immunity and indemnification of certain minors.

Connecticut § 30-86
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 30Intoxicating Liquors
Ch. 545Liquor Control Act

This text of Connecticut § 30-86 (Sale or delivery to minors, intoxicated persons and habitual drunkards prohibited. Exceptions. Use of transaction scan devices. Immunity and indemnification of certain minors.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-86 (2026).

Text

(a)As used in this section:
(1)“Cardholder” means any person who presents a driver's license or an identity card to a permittee or permittee's agent or employee, to purchase or receive alcoholic liquor from such permittee or permittee's agent or employee;
(2)“Identity card” means an identification card issued in accordance with the provisions of section 1-1h ;
(3)“Transaction scan” means the process by which a permittee or permittee's agent or employee checks, by means of a transaction scan device, the validity of a driver's license or an identity card; and (4) “Transaction scan device” means any commercial device or combination of devices used at a point of sale that is capable of deciphering in an electronically readable format the information encoded on the magnetic strip or bar cod

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slicer v. Quigley
429 A.2d 855 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1980)
56 case citations
Conroy v. Caron
275 F. Supp. 3d 328 (D. Connecticut, 2017)
25 case citations
Peerless Insurance v. Disla
999 F. Supp. 261 (D. Connecticut, 1998)
8 case citations
Van Kruiningen v. PLAN B, LLC
485 F. Supp. 2d 92 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
7 case citations
Rangel v. Parkhurst, No. Cv 96 011 16 12 (Dec. 7, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 15821 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Hermitage Insurance v. Walters
882 F. Supp. 31 (D. Connecticut, 1995)
Wilson v. Bradley
917 A.2d 1066 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2007)

Legislative History

(1949 Rev., S. 4293; 1971, P.A. 343, S. 2; P.A. 82-68, S. 3, 11; P.A. 84-478, S. 2, 5; P.A. 86-151, S. 3; P.A. 99-237, S. 1; P.A. 01-92, S. 1; P.A. 03-19, S. 71; P.A. 06-112, S. 3; P.A. 13-258, S. 9; P.A. 14-76, S. 6; P.A. 21-37, S. 94; P.A. 24-142, S. 72.) History: 1971 act deleted provision which had forbidden permittee to sell liquor to “any person after having received notice from the selectmen, as provided in Sec. 30-83 or 30-84, not to sell or give such liquor to such person”; P.A. 82-68 provided that the sale or delivery prohibition is inapplicable to persons over 18 employed or holding a permit and where the sale or delivery is made in the course of such person's business; P.A. 84-478 increased the penalty for furnishing liquor to minors to $1,500 or imprisonment for 18 months or both, and excepted from this provision any sale made in good faith, effective July 1, 1985; P.A. 86-151 exempted deliveries made to a minor by a parent, guardian or spouse who has attained the age of 21, provided the minor possesses such liquor while accompanied by such parent, guardian or spouse; P.A. 99-237 made technical and gender neutral changes and added provision prohibiting shipment or sale of alcoholic liquor to persons under 21 years of age by any means, specifically including shipment or sales arranged via the Internet or any other on-line computer network; P.A. 01-92 added new Subsec. (a) re definitions, designated existing language as Subsec. (b), added new Subsec. (c) re use of a transaction scan device, added new Subsec. (d) re prohibited acts and added new Subsec. (e) re affirmative defense; P.A. 03-19 made a technical change in Subsec. (e)(2)(B), effective May 12, 2003; P.A. 06-112 amended Subsec. (b) to designate prohibition on certain sales or deliveries by permittees or their servants or agents as Subdiv. (1), designate prohibition on any person selling, shipping, delivering or giving alcoholic liquor to a minor as Subdiv. (2), designate exceptions to prohibitions as Subdiv. (3) and amend same to replace numeric Subdiv. indicators with alphabetic Subpara. indicators, add Subdiv. (4) providing that nothing in Subsec. shall be construed to burden a person's exercise of religion under Art. 1, Sec. 3 of the state constitution in violation of Sec. 52-571b(a) and make technical changes; P.A. 13-258 amended Subsec. (b)(2) to change maximum fine from $1,500 to $3,500; P.A. 14-76 amended Subsec. (d)(2) to add reference to Sec. 53-344b(e); P.A. 21-37 amended Subsec. (d)(1) to make a technical change and amended Subsec. (d)(5) to replace civil penalty of not more than $1,000 with any penalty set forth in Sec. 30-55, effective July 1, 2021; P.A. 24-142 added Subsec. (f) re immunity and indemnification of minor participating in certain investigation or enforcement actions, and made a technical change in Subsec. (b)(1), effective June 6, 2024. Restriction against permittee furnishing liquor to minor cannot be removed by word or act of parent or guardian. 120 C. 44. Knowledge is not an element of the offense as regards sales to intoxicated persons or minors. 122 C. 441. It is not necessary that the condition of the intoxicated persons comply with some definite criteria of intoxication. Id., 442. The responsibility for making effective the prohibition against sale to minors rests upon the holders of permits. 124 C. 690. Revocation for selling to intoxicated person not done illegally or without evidence. 128 C. 304. Illegal sale or delivery by employee acting within scope of his authority made permittee liable; criminal intent is not an essential element in a sale to a minor. 130 C. 376. Reversal of commission for revocation under former statute. Id., 696. Master is criminally liable for a sale by his employee to a minor only when the employee acts within scope of his employment. 141 C. 430. Cited. 144 C. 241. Where beer was consumed by minors on permit premises in booths to which it had been brought by their companions, all over twenty-one, who had obtained the same at service counter, companions were not agents of permittee and his permit could not be revoked by commission on grounds of delivery to minors. 149 C. 65. Dismissal of charge under statute not res judicata re liquor commission hearing. 151 C. 524. Cited. 154 C. 407. Sale in violation of section does not give rise to common law cause of action against seller. Id., 432. Statute does not change common law rule that proximate cause of intoxication is voluntary consumption of liquor, not furnishing of it as to 16-year-old minor; he may be presumed to have consumed liquor voluntarily. Id., 644. Cited. 170 C. 356. Common law rule upheld that driver's voluntary consumption of liquor, not defendant's furnishing of it in violation of statute, was the proximate cause of driver's intoxication and plaintiff's injuries. 180 C. 252. Cited. 200 C. 400; 201 C. 385; 207 C. 88; 216 C. 667; 236 C. 670. Cited. 11 CA 122; 14 CA 333. Status of defendant as care provider assigned by Department of Children and Families was not the equivalent of a guardian relationship for exception purposes of section. 69 CA 400. Cited. 10 CS 283. Sale of alcohol to minor by employee sufficient to warrant permittee an unsuitable person. 12 CS 388. Permittee not declared unsuitable where it was proved he had instructed employee not to serve minor. 17 CS 442. Limitations to rule that violation of statute is negligence per se. 19 CS 310. Cited. 22 CS 300. Naked assertion of principal witness as to his age held of insufficient probative value, without corroboration from an available dependable source of proof, to convict defendant of crime of selling alcoholic liquor to a minor. Id., 353. Cited. 23 CS 195; Id., 459; 24 CS 75; 39 CS 20. Containers offered as exhibits and identified positively by minor held admissible. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 457. Sale to fraternity, whose social chairman was a minor and who ordered liquor, held to be violation of statute. Id., 476. Court held delivery of liquor to minors within private residence not exempt from proscription of statute; where language of statute is unambiguous, there is no need to construe it. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 181. Cited. Id., 565. Seller's conviction upheld although she produced statement under Sec. 30-86a, where prior statement was forged and no statement required by her for instant purchase. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 170. Whether beer defendant sold to minor was alcoholic liquor within prohibition of statute was question of fact for jury. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 373. Subsec. (b): Language of Subsec. is clear and unambiguous and applies to minors. 49 CS 168.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 30-86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/30-86.