(1)This section shall apply whenever the
commissioner finds or has reasonable cause to believe that any pesticide or device:
(a)Is adulterated or misbranded;
(b)Has not been registered under the provisions of this article;
(c)Fails to bear on its label the information required by this article; or
(d)Is in violation of any provision of this article or any rule made pursuant to
this article.
(2)If any of the conditions specified in subsection (1) of this section apply,
the commissioner may affix to such pesticide or device a tag or other appropriate
marking giving notice thereof and stating that the pesticide or device has been
detained or embargoed and warning all persons not to remove or dispose of such
pesticide or device by sale or otherwise until permission for removal
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(1) This section shall apply whenever the
commissioner finds or has reasonable cause to believe that any pesticide or device:
(a) Is adulterated or misbranded;
(b) Has not been registered under the provisions of this article;
(c) Fails to bear on its label the information required by this article; or
(d) Is in violation of any provision of this article or any rule made pursuant to
this article.
(2) If any of the conditions specified in subsection (1) of this section apply,
the commissioner may affix to such pesticide or device a tag or other appropriate
marking giving notice thereof and stating that the pesticide or device has been
detained or embargoed and warning all persons not to remove or dispose of such
pesticide or device by sale or otherwise until permission for removal or disposal is
given by the commissioner or a court of competent jurisdiction.
(3) Any person who removes or disposes of such detained or embargoed
pesticide or device by sale or otherwise, without prior permission, or removes or
alters the tag or marking commits a class 2 misdemeanor. In addition, such person
may be subjected to appropriate administrative proceedings.
(4) When a pesticide or device detained or embargoed under subsection (2)
of this section has been found by the commissioner to be in violation of any
provision of this article 9 or any rule adopted pursuant to this article 9, and if the
violation has not been resolved in thirty days, the commissioner may petition a court
of competent jurisdiction for a condemnation of such pesticide or device. When the
commissioner has found that a pesticide or device so detained or embargoed is not
adulterated or misbranded, the commissioner shall remove the tag or other
marking.
(5) If the court finds that a detained or embargoed pesticide or device is in
violation of this article 9 or rules adopted pursuant to this article 9, the pesticide or
device shall after entry of the decree be destroyed at the expense of the owner,
claimant, or custodian of the pesticide or device, under the supervision of the
commissioner, and all court costs and attorney fees and storage and other proper
expenses shall be assessed against the owner, claimant, or custodian of the
pesticide or device or the owner's, claimant's, or custodian's agent. However, if the
adulteration or misbranding can be corrected by proper labeling or processing of
the pesticide or device, the court, after entry of the decree and after such costs,
attorney fees, and expenses have been paid and a good and sufficient bond has
been executed, conditioned upon the proper labeling or processing of such
pesticide or device, may order that the pesticide or device be delivered to the
owner, claimant, or custodian for such labeling or processing under the supervision
of the commissioner. The expense of such supervision shall be paid by the owner,
claimant, or custodian. The pesticide or device shall be returned to the owner,
claimant, or custodian on the representation to the court by the commissioner that
the pesticide or device is no longer in violation of this article 9 and that the
expenses of such supervision have been paid.