California Statutes
§ 2933.1. — 2933.1. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 787, Sec. 25.)
California·Code PEN Penal Code - PEN·Title 1.·Part 3. TITLE 1. IMPRISONMENT OF MALE PRISONERS IN STATE PRISONS·Ch. 7. CHAPTER 7. Execution of Sentences of Imprisonment·Art. 2.5. ARTICLE 2.5. Credit on Term of Imprisonment
(a)Notwithstanding any other law, any person who is convicted of a felony offense listed in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 shall accrue no more than 15 percent of worktime credit, as defined in Section 2933.
(b)The 15-percent limitation provided in subdivision (a) shall apply whether the defendant is sentenced under Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 1170) of Title 7 of Part 2 or sentenced under some other law. However, nothing in subdivision (a) shall affect the requirement of any statute that the defendant serve a specified period of time prior to minimum parole eligibility, nor shall any offender otherwise statutorily ineligible for credit be eligible for credit pursuant to this section.
(c)Notwithstanding Section 4019 or any other provision of law, the maximum credit that may b
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 2933.1. (2933.1. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 787, Sec. 25.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Tate
37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 710 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)
Coleman v. Brown
952 F. Supp. 2d 901 (E.D. California, 2013)
David Edwards v. Gary Swarthout
597 F. App'x 914 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Ward v. Brown
891 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (E.D. California, 2012)
David McDonough v. James Yates
526 F. App'x 796 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Etcheverry v. Woodford
255 F. App'x 277 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Contero v. Tilton
248 F. App'x 778 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
(PC) Williams v. CDCR
(E.D. California, 2024)
(HC) Metts-Montez v. Pallares
(E.D. California, 2021)
Ray v. Sullivan
(N.D. California, 2021)
Richardson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
(N.D. California, 2020)
Smith v. Spearman
(N.D. California, 2021)
Bankuthy v. Woodford
376 F. App'x 694 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Patrick Carrizosa, Jr. v. Jeanne Woodford
388 F. App'x 676 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Cruz v. Roe
90 F. App'x 520 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Maged Karas v. Cdcr
(Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 787, Sec. 25. Effective January 1, 2003.