California Statutes
§ 970. — 970. (Enacted by Stats. 1937, Ch. 90.)
California·Code LAB Labor Code - LAB·Div. 2. DIVISION 2. EMPLOYMENT REGULATION AND SUPERVISION·Part 3. PART 3. PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Solicitation of Employees by Misrepresentation
No person, or agent or officer thereof, directly or indirectly, shall influence, persuade, or engage any person to change from one place to another in this State or from any place outside to any place within the State, or from any place within the State to any place outside, for the purpose of working in any branch of labor, through or by means of knowingly false representations, whether spoken, written, or advertised in printed form, concerning either:
(a)The kind, character, or existence of such work;
(b)The length of time such work will last, or the compensation therefor;
(c)The sanitary or housing conditions relating to or surrounding the work;
(d)The existence or nonexistence of any strike, lockout, or other labor dispute affecting it and pending between the proposed employer and
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 970. (970. (Enacted by Stats. 1937, Ch. 90.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilberto Rivera, Nicholas Alberto, Luis Navarro, Jose Garcia, Hector Garcia, Pablo Galindo, Socorro Mendivil, Rogelio Casares v. Joe Anaya
726 F.2d 564 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
Aguilera v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp.
223 F.3d 1010 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation v. Paul Mantor, an Individual
335 F.3d 1101 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Richard Allan Funk v. Sperry Corporation, Dba Sperry Univac
842 F.2d 1129 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.
381 F. Supp. 3d 1240 (E.D. California, 2019)
Ulbrich v. Overstock.com, Inc.
887 F. Supp. 2d 924 (N.D. California, 2012)
Burden v. County of Santa Clara
96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 587 (California Court of Appeal, 2000)
Berdux v. Project Time & Cost, Inc.
669 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (N.D. California, 2009)
Auble v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
55 F. Supp. 2d 1019 (N.D. California, 1999)
Schultz v. Spraylat Corp.
866 F. Supp. 1535 (C.D. California, 1994)
Frades v. Zurich American Ins. Co.
(E.D. California, 2020)
Cathy Kirkwood v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2025)
Chang v. Cashman
(N.D. California, 2024)
Stephen Rozzo v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2024)
Byelick v. Ryvyl Inc.
(S.D. California, 2024)
Walgreen Co. v. Anest CA3
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Boseovski v. McCloud Healthcare Clinic, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2020)
McCard v. CIRCOR International, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2021)
S. v. Ali
(N.D. California, 2024)
Miller v. Unified Science, LLC
(S.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Enacted by Stats. 1937, Ch. 90.