California Statutes
§ 925. — 925. (Added by Stats. 2016, Ch. 632, Sec. 1.)
California § 925.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code LABLabor Code - LAB
Div. 2.DIVISION 2. EMPLOYMENT REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
Part 3.PART 3. PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES
Ch. 1.CHAPTER 1. Contracts Against Public Policy
This text of California § 925. (925. (Added by Stats. 2016, Ch. 632, Sec. 1.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Labor Code - LAB Code § 925. (2026).
Text
(a)An employer shall not require an employee who primarily resides and works in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to a provision that would do either of the following:
(1)Require the employee to adjudicate outside of California a claim arising in California.
(2)Deprive the employee of the substantive protection of California law with respect to a controversy arising in California.
(b)Any provision of a contract that violates subdivision (a) is voidable by the employee, and if a provision is rendered void at the request of the employee, the matter shall be
adjudicated in California and California law shall govern the dispute.
(c)In addition to injunctive relief and any other remedies available, a court may award an employee who is enforcing his or her rights unde
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
28 F.4th 956 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Fleming v. Matco Tools Corp.
384 F. Supp. 3d 1124 (N.D. California, 2019)
Miller-Garcia v. Avani Media, LLC
(N.D. California, 2020)
Eller v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2023)
Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney General
(S.D. California, 2024)
Luis Montoya Jr. v. Ariba Inc.
(C.D. California, 2023)
Tyler Kem v. Strike Advisory, LLC
(C.D. California, 2023)
Yeomans v. World Financial Group
(N.D. California, 2019)
Joubert v. Lienhard
(N.D. California, 2020)
TigerGraph, Inc. v. Peak
(N.D. California, 2020)
Norris v. Aon PLC
(N.D. California, 2021)
Chalmers v. DSSV, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2023)
Pierman v. Stryker Corporation
(S.D. California, 2020)
Buchsbaum v. Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC
(S.D. California, 2020)
Johnathon Ervin v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
(C.D. California, 2025)
Arden Reneau v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
(C.D. California, 2025)
Wesley Hunter v. Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
Graciela Tanious v. Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC
(C.D. California, 2024)
Peters v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
Gold Coast Search Partners LLC v. Career Partners, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2019)
Legislative History
Added by Stats. 2016, Ch. 632, Sec. 1. (SB 1241) Effective January 1, 2017.
Nearby Sections
7
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 925., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/LAB/925..