California Statutes
§ 995. — 995. (Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.)
California·Code GOV Government Code - GOV·Div. 3.6.·Title 1. DIVISION 3.6. CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES·Part 7. PART 7. DEFENSE OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Except as otherwise provided in Sections 995.2 and 995.4, upon request of an employee or former employee, a public entity shall provide for the defense of any civil action or proceeding brought against him, in his official or individual capacity or both, on account of an act or omission in the scope of his employment as an employee of the public entity.
For the purposes of this part, a cross-action, counterclaim or cross-complaint against an employee or former employee shall be deemed to be a civil action or proceeding brought against him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 995. (995. (Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trevino v. Gates
99 F.3d 911 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Embury v. King
191 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. California, 2001)
Hall v. California Department of Corrections
835 F. Supp. 522 (N.D. California, 1993)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5862, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9569 Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Byrant Allen Freddie G. Helms Rodney Glenn King v. City of Los Angeles v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Claimant-Appellant
92 F.3d 842 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
In re City of San Bernardino
566 B.R. 46 (C.D. California, 2017)
Hayes v. Rojas
(E.D. California, 2020)
Weil v. Raisin City Elementary School District
(E.D. California, 2021)
(PC) Hepner v. County of Tulare
(E.D. California, 2022)
Ruelas v. City of Sanger
(E.D. California, 2023)
Estate of Abdiel Sarabia Hernandez v. County of San Diego
(S.D. California, 2025)
Legislative History
Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.