California Statutes
§ 98005. — 98005. (Added November 3, 1998, by initiative Proposition 5.)
California § 98005.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code GOVGovernment Code - GOV
Title 16.TITLE 16. STATE–TRIBAL AGREEMENTS GOVERNING INDIAN GAMING
Ch. 1.CHAPTER 1. The Tribal Government Gaming and Economic Self-Sufficiency Act of 1998
This text of California § 98005. (98005. (Added November 3, 1998, by initiative Proposition 5.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Government Code - GOV Code § 98005. (2026).
Text
The Gaming Compact offered in Section 98004 shall, to the extent permitted by law, be deemed agreed to, approved, and executed by the State of California in the event a request therefor is duly made by a federally recognized Indian tribe in accordance with Section 98002 and it is not executed by the Governor within the time prescribed in this chapter, provided that, in the event this provision is deemed to be unlawful or ineffective for any reason, or if the tribe in its discretion seeks to compel execution of the Gaming Compact through court action, the State of California hereby submits to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States in any action brought against the state by any federally recognized Indian tribe asserting any cause of action arising from the state’s refusal to ex
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Elk Valley Rancheria Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Redding Rancheria Smith River Rancheria, and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. The State of California
331 F.3d 1094 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California
813 F.3d 1155 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Chicken Ranch Rancheria v. State of California
42 F.4th 1024 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)
In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases
147 F. Supp. 2d 1011 (N.D. California, 2001)
Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria v. California
163 F. Supp. 3d 769 (E.D. California, 2016)
Club One Casino, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior
328 F. Supp. 3d 1033 (E.D. California, 2018)
FORT INDEPENDENCE INDIAN COMMUNITY v. California
679 F. Supp. 2d 1159 (E.D. California, 2009)
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California
343 F. Supp. 3d 952 (S.D. California, 2018)
RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION v. Schwarzenegger
602 F.3d 1019 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. California
331 F.3d 1094 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. Gale A. Norton
353 F.3d 712 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Legislative History
Added November 3, 1998, by initiative Proposition 5.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 98005., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/GOV/98005..