California Statutes
§ 945.6. — 945.6. (Amended by Stats. 1971, Ch. 438.)
California·Code GOV Government Code - GOV·Div. 3.6.·Title 1. DIVISION 3.6. CLAIMS AND ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES·Part 4. PART 4. ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Actions Against Public Entities
(a)Except as provided in Sections 946.4 and 946.6 and subject to subdivision (b), any suit brought against a public entity on a cause of action for which a claim is required to be presented in accordance with Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of Part 3 of this division must be commenced:
(1)If written notice is given in accordance with Section 913, not later than six months after the date such notice is personally delivered or deposited in the mail.
(2)If written notice is not given in accordance with Section 913, within two years from the accrual of the cause of action. If the period within which the public entity is required to act is extended pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 912.4, the period of such extension is not part of th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 945.6. (945.6. (Amended by Stats. 1971, Ch. 438.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. City of Visalia
687 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (E.D. California, 2009)
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School District
830 F. Supp. 1560 (N.D. California, 1993)
Clarke v. Upton
703 F. Supp. 2d 1037 (E.D. California, 2010)
Anson v. County of Merced
202 Cal. App. 3d 1195 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
Quiroz v. Horel
85 F. Supp. 3d 1115 (N.D. California, 2015)
Gurrola v. County of Los Angeles
153 Cal. App. 3d 145 (California Court of Appeal, 1984)
Roberts v. County of Los Angeles
175 Cal. App. 4th 474 (California Court of Appeal, 2009)
Guzman v. Van Demark
651 F. Supp. 1180 (C.D. California, 1987)
Halus v. San Diego County Assessment Appeals Board
789 F. Supp. 327 (S.D. California, 1992)
Dennis v. Thurman
959 F. Supp. 1253 (C.D. California, 1997)
David Marshall v. Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Department
(C.D. California, 2020)
Joyce Ann Williams, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Children v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation
956 F.2d 1169 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Chatman v. County of Santa Clara
107 F.3d 15 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1490, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1910 David Minton Silva v. Andy Crain Michael Rotkin, in His Official Capacity as Mayor City of Santa Cruz
169 F.3d 608 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
(PS) Richardson v. County of Shasta
(E.D. California, 2020)
Pearson v. State of California
(N.D. California, 2022)
(PC) Turner v. M. Pallares
(E.D. California, 2023)
Klenk v. City of Etna
(E.D. California, 2023)
Johnson v. Meyer
(N.D. California, 2020)
Cooks v. Contra Costa County
(N.D. California, 2020)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1971, Ch. 438.