California Statutes
§ 846. — 846. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 92, Sec. 33.)
California·Code CIV Civil Code - CIV·Div. 2. DIVISION 2. PROPERTY·Title 3.·Part 2. TITLE 3. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF OWNERS·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Obligations of Owners
(a)An owner of any estate or any other interest in real property, whether possessory or nonpossessory, owes no duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for any recreational purpose or to give any warning of hazardous conditions, uses of, structures, or activities on those premises to persons entering for a recreational purpose, except as provided in this section.
(b)A “recreational purpose,” as used in this section, includes activities such as fishing, hunting, camping, water sports, hiking, spelunking, sport parachuting, riding, including animal riding, snowmobiling, and all other types of vehicular riding, rock collecting, sightseeing, picnicking, nature study, nature contacting, recreational gardening, gleaning, hang gliding, private noncommercial aviation act
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 846. (846. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 92, Sec. 33.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Graves v. United States Coast Guard
692 F.2d 71 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Jackson v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
94 Cal. App. 4th 1110 (California Court of Appeal, 2001)
Judd v. United States
650 F. Supp. 1503 (S.D. California, 1987)
Hannon v. United States
801 F. Supp. 323 (E.D. California, 1992)
Mattice v. United States
752 F. Supp. 905 (N.D. California, 1990)
Simpson v. United States
564 F. Supp. 945 (C.D. California, 1982)
Chidester v. United States
646 F. Supp. 189 (C.D. California, 1986)
Toomey v. United States
714 F. Supp. 426 (E.D. California, 1989)
Coryell v. United States
847 F. Supp. 148 (C.D. California, 1994)
Schell v. United States
(E.D. California, 2024)
Gambel v. United States of America
(N.D. California, 2024)
Shears v. United States of America
(S.D. California, 2019)
Allen Pangelinan v. United States
(Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Marie Thornton v. USA
(Ninth Circuit, 2024)
Rose v. City of Suisun City
(E.D. California, 2022)
Winters v. United States
26 F. Supp. 3d 998 (E.D. California, 2014)
Patricia Lima v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
(C.D. California, 2020)
Charles v. Target Corporation
(N.D. California, 2022)
Ravell v. United States
855 F. Supp. 300 (C.D. California, 1992)
Singh v. United States
718 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (N.D. California, 2010)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 92, Sec. 33. (SB 1289) Effective January 1, 2019.