California Statutes
§ 3426.2. — 3426.2. (Added by Stats. 1984, Ch. 1724, Sec. 1.)
California § 3426.2.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code CIVCivil Code - CIV
Div. 4.DIVISION 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Title5.
Part 1.TITLE 5. UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT
This text of California § 3426.2. (3426.2. (Added by Stats. 1984, Ch. 1724, Sec. 1.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Civil Code - CIV Code § 3426.2. (2026).
Text
(a)Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined. Upon application to the court, an injunction shall be terminated when the trade secret has ceased to exist, but the injunction may be continued for an additional period of time in order to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation.
(b)If the court determines that it would be unreasonable to prohibit future use, an injunction may condition future use upon payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time the use could have been prohibited.
(c)In appropriate circumstances, affirmative acts to protect a trade secret may be compelled by court order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
02 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power System, Inc.
399 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (N.D. California, 2005)
Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.
819 F. Supp. 2d 1001 (E.D. California, 2011)
Pyro Spectaculars North, Inc. v. Souza
861 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (E.D. California, 2012)
Broidy Capital Management, LLC v. State of Qatar
982 F.3d 582 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Bridge Publications, Inc. v. Vien
827 F. Supp. 629 (S.D. California, 1993)
Bayer Corp. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
72 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (N.D. California, 1999)
Bunnell v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America
567 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (C.D. California, 2007)
B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Rogers
163 F. App'x 500 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Therapeutic Research Faculty v. NBTY, INC.
488 F. Supp. 2d 991 (E.D. California, 2007)
Examworks, LLC v. Todd Baldini
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Perrin Bernard Supowitz, LLC v. Pablo Morales
(Ninth Circuit, 2024)
Keating v. Jastremski
(S.D. California, 2021)
Cool Runnings International Inc v. Gonzalez
(E.D. California, 2021)
Moreland Apartments Associates v. LP Equity LLC
(N.D. California, 2019)
Citcon USA, LLC v. RiverPay, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Teros Advisors, LLC
(N.D. California, 2021)
v. Glam and Glits Nail Design, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2021)
LBF Travel Management Corp. v. DeRosa
(S.D. California, 2025)
Warman International Ltd., a Business Peko-Wallsend Operations Ltd., a Business v. Rm-Holz, Inc., a Business
977 F.2d 594 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Legislative History
Added by Stats. 1984, Ch. 1724, Sec. 1.
Nearby Sections
12
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 3426.2., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/CIV/3426.2..