California Statutes
§ 1021.5. — 1021.5. (Amended by Stats. 1993, Ch. 645, Sec. 2.)
California § 1021.5.
JurisdictionCalifornia
Code CCPCode of Civil Procedure - CCP
Title14.
Part 2.TITLE 14. OF MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Ch. 6.CHAPTER 6. Of Costs
This text of California § 1021.5. (1021.5. (Amended by Stats. 1993, Ch. 645, Sec. 2.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cal. Code of Civil Procedure - CCP Code § 1021.5. (2026).
Text
Upon motion, a court may award attorneys’ fees to a successful party against one or more opposing parties in any action which has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest if:
(a)a significant benefit, whether pecuniary or nonpecuniary, has been conferred on the general public or a large class of persons, (b) the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement, or of enforcement by one public entity against another public entity, are such as to make the award appropriate, and (c) such fees should not in the interest
of justice be paid out of the recovery, if any. With respect to actions involving public entities, this section applies to allowances against, but not in favor of, public entities, and no claim shall be required to be filed therefor
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Liliana Canela v. Costco
971 F.3d 845 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach
48 Cal. App. 4th 1152 (California Court of Appeal, 1996)
Scalia v. Cnty. of Kern
308 F. Supp. 3d 1064 (E.D. California, 2018)
Gregory Village Partners, L.P. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
805 F. Supp. 2d 888 (N.D. California, 2011)
People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC
231 Cal. Rptr. 3d 595 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Guerrero v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
231 F. Supp. 3d 797 (E.D. California, 2017)
MacDonald v. Ford Motor Co.
142 F. Supp. 3d 884 (N.D. California, 2015)
Aureflam Corp. v. Pho Hoa Phat I, Inc.
375 F. Supp. 2d 950 (N.D. California, 2005)
Carlos Collado v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc
550 F. App'x 368 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2024)
Flynn v. Vinson CA4/2
(California Court of Appeal, 2014)
Mynor F. Portillo v. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2019)
Theresa Dickinson v. Comerica Bank
(C.D. California, 2021)
Willis v. L.A. County Waterworks Dist. No. 40 CA5
(California Court of Appeal, 2021)
Cohen v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2025)
Independent Living Center of Southern California v. David Maxwell-Jolly
(C.D. California, 2019)
Annette Cody v. P.C. Richard and Son Service Company, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2023)
Janine Van Vleet v. Southwest Answering Service, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2024)
People v. Investco Management & Development LLC
(California Court of Appeal, 2018)
Willard v. Kelley
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 1993, Ch. 645, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 1994.
Nearby Sections
9
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
California § 1021.5., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ca/CCP/1021.5..