California Statutes

§ 14247. — 14247. (Added by Stats. 2007, Ch. 711, Sec. 2.)

California·Code BPC Business and Professions Code - BPC·Div. 6. General Provisions·Ch. 2. CHAPTER 2. Model State Trademark Law·Art. 9. ARTICLE 9. Violations
(a)Subject to the principles of equity, an owner of a mark that is famous and distinctive, whether inherently or through acquired distinctiveness, shall be entitled to an injunction against another person’s commercial use of a mark or trade name, if such use begins after the mark has become famous and is likely to cause dilution of the famous mark, and to obtain such other relief as is provided in this section. For purposes of this subdivision, a mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of this state, or by a geographic area of this state, as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. In determining whether a mark is famous, a court may consider factors including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(1)The duration, extent

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California § 14247. (14247. (Added by Stats. 2007, Ch. 711, Sec. 2.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
782 F. Supp. 2d 911 (C.D. California, 2011)
50 case citations
Facebook, Inc. v. Pedersen
868 F. Supp. 2d 953 (N.D. California, 2012)
16 case citations
Arcsoft, Inc. v. Cyberlink Corp.
153 F. Supp. 3d 1057 (N.D. California, 2015)
14 case citations
SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.
627 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (N.D. California, 2008)
13 case citations
Pinterest, Inc. v. Pintrips, Inc.
140 F. Supp. 3d 997 (N.D. California, 2015)
11 case citations
Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Services Co.
170 F. Supp. 3d 1249 (C.D. California, 2016)
7 case citations
Twentieth Century Fox Television v. Empire Distribution Inc.
161 F. Supp. 3d 902 (C.D. California, 2016)
4 case citations
Coach, Inc. v. ASIA PACIFIC TRADING COMPANY, INC.
676 F. Supp. 2d 914 (C.D. California, 2009)
3 case citations
Apple Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.
915 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (N.D. California, 2013)
1 case citations
Bamforth v. Facebook, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2021)
Glydways, Inc. v. Glyd, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)

Legislative History

Added by Stats. 2007, Ch. 711, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2008.
View on official source ↗