Arizona Statutes
§ 42-18204 — Judgment foreclosing right to redeem; effect
Arizona § 42-18204
JurisdictionArizona
Title 42Arizona Revised Statutes
Ch. 18COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
Art. 5Judicial Foreclosure of Right of Redemption
This text of Arizona § 42-18204 (Judgment foreclosing right to redeem; effect) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 42-18204 (2026).
Text
A. In an action to foreclose the right to redeem: 1. If the court finds that the tax lien sale is valid, the tax lien has not been redeemed and the defendant's request for an excess proceeds sale is unreasonable or the defendant did not request an excess proceeds sale, the court shall enter judgment:
(a)Foreclosing the right of the defendant to redeem.
(b)Directing the county treasurer to expeditiously execute and deliver to the party in whose favor judgment is entered, including the state, a deed conveying the property described in the certificate of purchase.
2. If the court finds that the tax lien sale is valid, the tax lien has not been redeemed and the defendant's request for an excess proceeds sale is reasonable, the court shall enter judgment:
(a)Foreclosing the right of the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roberts v. Robert
158 P.3d 899 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
Friedemann v. Kirk
5 P.3d 950 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)
Daystar Investments, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Treasurer
88 P.3d 1181 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2004)
Bauza Holdings, L.L.C. v. Primeco, Inc.
18 P.3d 132 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2001)
Delo v. Gmac Mortgage, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A.
302 P.3d 658 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2013)
Sun Valley Financial Services of Phoenix, L.L.C. v. Guzman
134 P.3d 400 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
National Tax v. Sweeney
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2019)
Umali v. Dhanani
77 F. App'x 423 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Umali v. Dhanani (In re Umali)
77 F. App'x 423 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Searle v. Allen
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 42-1001
Definitions§ 42-1005
Powers and duties of director§ 42-1007
Service of process upon the director§ 42-1051
Definitions§ 42-1052
Suits to enforce state tax; comity§ 42-11001
Definitions§ 42-11002
Property subject to taxation§ 42-11003
Double taxation prohibitedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 42-18204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/42-18204.