Arizona Statutes

§ 42-18204 — Judgment foreclosing right to redeem; effect

Arizona·Title 42 Arizona Revised Statutes·Ch. 18 COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT·Art. 5 Judicial Foreclosure of Right of Redemption

A. In an action to foreclose the right to redeem: 1. If the court finds that the tax lien sale is valid, the tax lien has not been redeemed and the defendant's request for an excess proceeds sale is unreasonable or the defendant did not request an excess proceeds sale, the court shall enter judgment:

(a)Foreclosing the right of the defendant to redeem.
(b)Directing the county treasurer to expeditiously execute and deliver to the party in whose favor judgment is entered, including the state, a deed conveying the property described in the certificate of purchase. 2. If the court finds that the tax lien sale is valid, the tax lien has not been redeemed and the defendant's request for an excess proceeds sale is reasonable, the court shall enter judgment:
(a)Foreclosing the right of the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arizona § 42-18204 (Judgment foreclosing right to redeem; effect) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Robert
158 P.3d 899 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
14 case citations
Friedemann v. Kirk
5 P.3d 950 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)
8 case citations
Daystar Investments, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Treasurer
88 P.3d 1181 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2004)
7 case citations
Bauza Holdings, L.L.C. v. Primeco, Inc.
18 P.3d 132 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2001)
6 case citations
Delo v. Gmac Mortgage, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A.
302 P.3d 658 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2013)
6 case citations
Sun Valley Financial Services of Phoenix, L.L.C. v. Guzman
134 P.3d 400 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
5 case citations
National Tax v. Sweeney
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2019)
Umali v. Dhanani
77 F. App'x 423 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Umali v. Dhanani (In re Umali)
77 F. App'x 423 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Searle v. Allen
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗