Arizona Statutes
§ 21-412 — Evidence on behalf of person under investigation
Arizona § 21-412
This text of Arizona § 21-412 (Evidence on behalf of person under investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 21-412 (2026).
Text
The grand jurors are under no duty to hear evidence at the request of the person under investigation, but may do so. The person under investigation shall have the right to advice of counsel during the giving of any testimony by him before the grand jury, provided that such counsel may not communicate with anyone other than his client. If such counsel communicates with anyone other than his client he may be summarily expelled by the court from the grand jury chambers. The grand jurors shall weigh all the evidence received by them and when they have reasonable ground to believe that other evidence, which is available, will explain away the contemplated charge, they may require the evidence to be produced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II
678 P.2d 1386 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Jessen
633 P.2d 410 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Just
675 P.2d 1353 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1983)
Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY.
668 P.2d 882 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1983)
Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona
679 P.2d 1043 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)
Franzi v. Superior Court
679 P.2d 1043 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)
Trebus v. Davis
944 P.2d 1235 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1997)
Maretick v. Jarrett
62 P.3d 120 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2003)
State v. Kamin
725 P.2d 1104 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)
Herrell v. Sargeant
944 P.2d 1241 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1997)
Bashir v. Pineda
248 P.3d 199 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
Black v. Coker
247 P.3d 1005 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
State v. Coconino County Superior Court, Division II
678 P.2d 1386 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Doolittle
746 P.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)
State v. Superior Court
751 P.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state
515 P.3d 142 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2022)
Franz v. State
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2025)
John Christian Hansen, II v. Hon. Chon-Lopez
501 P.3d 762 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2021)
State v. Horton
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2016)
State v. Jones
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2017)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 21-101
Definitions§ 21-121
Jury room§ 21-131
Jury commissioner§ 21-201
Qualifications§ 21-211
Disqualification§ 21-221
Fees and mileage§ 21-222
Fair jury improvement fund§ 21-223
Failure of juror to attend; fineCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 21-412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/21-412.