Arizona Statutes
§ 13-4437 — Standing to invoke rights; recovery of damages; right to counsel
Arizona § 13-4437
This text of Arizona § 13-4437 (Standing to invoke rights; recovery of damages; right to counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-4437 (2026).
Text
A.The rights enumerated in the victims' bill of rights, article II, section 2.1, Constitution of Arizona, any implementing legislation or court rules belong to the victim. The victim has standing to seek an order, to bring a special action or to file a notice of appearance in a trial court or an appellate proceeding, seeking to enforce any right or to challenge an order denying any right guaranteed to victims. A victim may not be charged a filing fee to file a special action or to seek an order pursuant to this subsection. In asserting any right, the victim has the right to be represented by personal counsel at the victim's expense and the proceedings may be initiated by the victim's counsel or the prosecutor.
B.A victim has the right to recover damages from a governmental entity respo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lynn v. Reinstein
68 P.3d 412 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2003)
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Klein
150 P.3d 778 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of City of Tucson
844 P.2d 1165 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
State v. Quijada
439 P.3d 815 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2019)
State v. Nichols
233 P.3d 1148 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2010)
Lindsay R. v. Cohen
343 P.3d 435 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
State v. Leonardo
250 P.3d 1222 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Padilla
364 P.3d 479 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
State v. Lee
245 P.3d 919 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
Morehart v. Barton
250 P.3d 1139 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2011)
P.M. v. Gould
136 P.3d 223 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
Beth Fay v. Hon. fox/state/jordan Hanson
494 P.3d 1105 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2021)
Morehart v. Barton
236 P.3d 1216 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2010)
State of Arizona v. Vivek a Patel
486 P.3d 188 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. Martinson
384 P.3d 307 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2016)
Martin-Costa v. Kiger
235 P.3d 1040 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2010)
Douglass v. State
195 P.3d 189 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2008)
J v. v. Hon blair/morris
536 P.3d 1223 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2023)
E.H. v. Hon. Slayton
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2019)
G.F. v. Hon. Nielson
556 P.3d 1220 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2024)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-4437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-4437.