Arizona Statutes
§ 13-4403 — Inability to exercise rights; lawful representatives; notice; definition
Arizona § 13-4403
This text of Arizona § 13-4403 (Inability to exercise rights; lawful representatives; notice; definition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-4403 (2026).
Text
A.If a victim is physically or emotionally unable to exercise any right but is able to designate a lawful representative who is not a bona fide witness, the designated representative may exercise the same rights that the victim is entitled to exercise. The victim may revoke this designation at any time and exercise the victim's rights.
B.If a victim is incompetent, deceased or otherwise incapable of designating a representative to act in the victim's place, the court may appoint a lawful representative who is not a witness. If at any time the victim is no longer incompetent, incapacitated or otherwise incapable of acting, the victim may personally exercise the victim's rights.
C.If the victim is a minor or vulnerable adult the victim's parent, child or other immediate family member
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Connor
161 P.3d 596 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
In Re Ryan A.
39 P.3d 543 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2002)
J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of Arizona
335 P.3d 1118 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2014)
State v. Slover
204 P.3d 1088 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2009)
Lincoln v. Holt
156 P.3d 438 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
State v. Uriarte
981 P.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1998)
In Re Erika V.
983 P.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1999)
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Dairman
95 P.3d 548 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2004)
State v. Lee
245 P.3d 919 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
P.M. v. Gould
136 P.3d 223 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
J.D. v. Hegyi
320 P.3d 826 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Padilla ex rel. County of Maricopa
371 P.3d 642 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2016)
State v. Lucas
321 P.3d 428 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
State of Arizona v. John David Franklin, Sr. & John David Franklin, Jr.
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
State of Arizona v. Robert Leeroy Slover
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2009)
State v. Baca
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
State v. Hon. padilla/simcox
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2016)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-4403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-4403.