Arizona Statutes
§ 13-4064 — Order compelling person to testify or produce evidence; immunity from use of such evidence; contempt
Arizona § 13-4064
JurisdictionArizona
Title 13Arizona Revised Statutes
Ch. 38MISCELLANEOUS
Art. 20Competency and Privileges
This text of Arizona § 13-4064 (Order compelling person to testify or produce evidence; immunity from use of such evidence; contempt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-4064 (2026).
Text
In any criminal proceeding before a court or grand jury, if a person refuses to answer a question or produce evidence of any other kind on the ground that he may be incriminated thereby and if the prosecuting attorney, in writing, requests the court to order that person to answer the question or produce the evidence, the court may so order and that person shall comply with the order. When the court denies such a request, the court shall state its reasons for denial in writing. After complying, such testimony or evidence, or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or evidence, shall not be used against the person in any proceeding or prosecution for a crime or offense concerning which he gave answer or produced evidence under court order. However, he may neverthel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Fisher
686 P.2d 750 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Axley
646 P.2d 268 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1982)
State v. Mills
995 P.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1999)
State v. Ott
808 P.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)
Franzi v. Koedyker
758 P.2d 1303 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
State v. Gertz
918 P.2d 1056 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
State v. Verdugo
602 P.2d 472 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Blankinship
622 P.2d 66 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1980)
State v. Kasten
823 P.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)
John Doe I v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR PIMA CTY.
717 P.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Patchell v. State
711 P.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
State v. Cornejo
677 P.2d 1312 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1983)
Jacobsen v. Lindberg
238 P.3d 129 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2010)
State v. Carruth
774 P.2d 1363 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1988)
Northern v. Stewart
32 F. App'x 800 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
E.L. v. Hon Carman
500 P.3d 326 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2021)
State ex rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court
600 P.2d 54 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1979)
State v. Leyba
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
State v. Quiroz
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2018)
State v. Rogers
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2022)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-4064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-4064.