Arizona Statutes
§ 13-4062 — Anti-marital fact privilege; other privileged communications
Arizona § 13-4062
JurisdictionArizona
Title 13Arizona Revised Statutes
Ch. 38MISCELLANEOUS
Art. 20Competency and Privileges
This text of Arizona § 13-4062 (Anti-marital fact privilege; other privileged communications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-4062 (2026).
Text
A person shall not be examined as a witness in the following cases:
1.A husband for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, as to events occurring during the marriage, nor can either, during the marriage or afterwards, without consent of the other, be examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage. These exceptions do not apply in a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by the husband against the wife, or by the wife against the husband, nor in a criminal action or proceeding against the husband for abandonment, failure to support or provide for or failure or neglect to furnish the necessities of life to the wife or the minor children. Either spouse may be examined as a witness for
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Adamson
665 P.2d 972 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Beaty
762 P.2d 519 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1988)
Samaritan Foundation v. Goodfarb
862 P.2d 870 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1993)
Blazek v. Superior Court
869 P.2d 509 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1994)
Bishop v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA CTY.
724 P.2d 23 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Cohen
844 P.2d 1147 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1992)
Roman Catholic Diocese v. Superior Court
62 P.3d 970 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2003)
Samaritan Health Services v. City of Glendale
714 P.2d 887 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith
475 P.3d 558 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Bogan
905 P.2d 515 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
Benton v. Superior Court, Navajo County
897 P.2d 1352 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1994)
Christopher Matthew Clements v. Hon. bernini/state
471 P.3d 645 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2020)
R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy Vanders
485 P.3d 1068 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2021)
Roehrs v. Minnesota Life Insurance
228 F.R.D. 642 (D. Arizona, 2005)
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Ditsworth
166 P.3d 130 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2007)
State v. Carvajal
709 P.2d 1366 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Schneider
130 P.3d 991 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
State v. Archibeque
221 P.3d 1045 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2009)
Atwood v. Schriro
489 F. Supp. 2d 982 (D. Arizona, 2007)
Hospital Corp. of America v. Superior Court
755 P.2d 1198 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1988)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-4062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-4062.