Arizona Statutes
§ 13-3925 — Unlawful search or seizure; admissibility of evidence; definitions
Arizona § 13-3925
This text of Arizona § 13-3925 (Unlawful search or seizure; admissibility of evidence; definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-3925 (2026).
Text
A.Any evidence that is seized pursuant to a search warrant shall not be suppressed as a result of a violation of this chapter except as required by the United States Constitution and the constitution of this state.
B.If a party in a criminal proceeding seeks to exclude evidence from the trier of fact because of the conduct of a peace officer in obtaining the evidence, the proponent of the evidence may urge that the peace officer's conduct was taken in a reasonable, good faith belief that the conduct was proper and that the evidence discovered should not be kept from the trier of fact if otherwise admissible.
C.The trial court shall not suppress evidence that is otherwise admissible in a criminal proceeding if the court determines that the evidence was seized by a peace officer as a re
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Hyde
921 P.2d 655 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1996)
State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas Valenzuela
371 P.3d 627 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Don Jacob Havatone
389 P.3d 1251 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2017)
State v. Moorman
744 P.2d 679 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Brita
761 P.2d 1025 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Greene
784 P.2d 257 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Crowley
41 P.3d 618 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2002)
State v. Coats
797 P.2d 693 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)
State v. Evans
866 P.2d 869 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1994)
State v. Hicks
707 P.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
State of Arizona v. Courtney Noelle Weakland
434 P.3d 578 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. LaPonsie
664 P.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1982)
State v. Maldonado
793 P.2d 1138 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)
State v. Brita
744 P.2d 429 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)
State v. Main
764 P.2d 1155 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1988)
State v. Conner
467 P.3d 246 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2020)
State v. Foncette
356 P.3d 328 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
State v. Evans
836 P.2d 1024 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
State v. Nahee
745 P.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II
359 P.3d 1 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-3925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-3925.