Arizona Statutes
§ 13-2310 — Fraudulent schemes and artifices; classification; definition
Arizona § 13-2310
This text of Arizona § 13-2310 (Fraudulent schemes and artifices; classification; definition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-2310 (2026).
Text
A.Any person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, knowingly obtains any benefit by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or material omissions is guilty of a class 2 felony.
B.Reliance on the part of any person shall not be a necessary element of the offense described in subsection A of this section.
C.A person who is convicted of a violation of this section that involved a benefit with a value of one hundred thousand dollars or more or the manufacture, sale or marketing of opioids is not eligible for suspension of sentence, probation, pardon or release from confinement on any basis except pursuant to section 31-233, subsection A or B until the sentence imposed by the court has been served, the person is eligible for release pursuant to section
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ness v. Western Security Life Insurance
851 P.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
636 P.2d 1257 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1981)
In Re American Continental Corporation/Lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation
794 F. Supp. 1424 (D. Arizona, 1992)
Rhue v. Dawson
841 P.2d 215 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
McCallister Co. v. Kastella
825 P.2d 980 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
State v. Bridgeforth
750 P.2d 3 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Booker
135 P.3d 57 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
In Re Paul M.
7 P.3d 131 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)
STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. Campos
250 P.3d 201 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
Holeman v. Neils
803 F. Supp. 237 (D. Arizona, 1992)
Pearce v. Stone
720 P.2d 542 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Franzi v. Koedyker
758 P.2d 1303 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Matter of Estate of Vigliotto
870 P.2d 1163 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1993)
In Re One 1983 Toyota
814 P.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tolleson
773 P.2d 490 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
State v. Bedoni
779 P.2d 355 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
Donahoe v. Arpaio
986 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (D. Arizona, 2013)
Anchor Equities, Ltd. v. Joya
773 P.2d 1022 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
State v. Adams
941 P.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1997)
Hashimoto v. Clark
264 B.R. 585 (D. Arizona, 2001)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 13-1001
Attempt; classifications§ 13-1002
Solicitation; classifications§ 13-1003
Conspiracy; classification§ 13-1004
Facilitation; classification§ 13-101
Purposes§ 13-101.01
Additional purposes of the criminal law§ 13-102
Applicability of title§ 13-104
Rule of construction§ 13-105
Definitions§ 13-107
Time limitations§ 13-108
Territorial applicabilityCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Arizona § 13-2310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/az/13-2310.