Arizona § 13-206 Entrapment

Arizona Statutes

§ 13-206 — Entrapment

Arizona § 13-206

Title 13Arizona Revised Statutes

Ch. 2GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY

This text of Arizona § 13-206 (Entrapment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-206 (2026).

Text

A.It is an affirmative defense to a criminal charge that the person was entrapped. To claim entrapment, the person must admit by the person's testimony or other evidence the substantial elements of the offense charged.

B.A person who asserts an entrapment defense has the burden of proving the following by clear and convincing evidence:

1.The idea of committing the offense started with law enforcement officers or their agents rather than with the person.

2.The law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the person to commit the offense.

3.The person was not predisposed to commit the type of offense charged before the law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the person to commit the offense.

C.A person does not establish entrapment if the person wa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. It is an affirmative defense to a criminal charge that the person was entrapped. To claim entrapment, the person must admit by the person's testimony or other evidence the substantial elements of the offense charged.

B. A person who asserts an entrapment defense has the burden of proving the following by clear and convincing evidence:

1. The idea of committing the offense started with law enforcement officers or their agents rather than with the person.

2. The law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the person to commit the offense.

3. The person was not predisposed to commit the type of offense charged before the law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the person to commit the offense.

C. A person does not establish entrapment if the person was predisposed to commit the offense and the law enforcement officers or their agents merely provided the person with an opportunity to commit the offense. It is not entrapment for law enforcement officers or their agents merely to use a ruse or to conceal their identity. The conduct of law enforcement officers and their agents may be considered in determining if a person has proven entrapment.