Arkansas § 2-1-101 Prohibition against center pivot irrigation discharge on interstate

Arkansas Statutes

§ 2-1-101 — Prohibition against center pivot irrigation discharge on interstate

Arkansas § 2-1-101

Title2

This text of Arkansas § 2-1-101 (Prohibition against center pivot irrigation discharge on interstate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ark. Code Ann. § 2-1-101 (2026).

Text

(a)It is unlawful for a person, sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation that engages in irrigation of any farm or agricultural lands to intentionally permit or cause any center pivot irrigation water to be discharged onto the traveled portion of any interstate or state highway.

(b)(1) A first violation of this section shall cause a warning to be issued.

(2)Upon conviction of a second or subsequent offense, the offender shall be guilty of a violation and punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250).

(c)It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the discharge of center pivot irrigation waters onto an interstate or state highway resulted from winds of such intensity that no mechanical device

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) It is unlawful for a person, sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation that engages in irrigation of any farm or agricultural lands to intentionally permit or cause any center pivot irrigation water to be discharged onto the traveled portion of any interstate or state highway. (b) (1) A first violation of this section shall cause a warning to be issued. (2) Upon conviction of a second or subsequent offense, the offender shall be guilty of a violation and punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250). (c) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the discharge of center pivot irrigation waters onto an interstate or state highway resulted from winds of such intensity that no mechanical device that is intended to prevent spray from reaching the roadway could have prevented the spraying or that the discharge resulted from excessive rainfall that contributed to flooding of the roadway.