Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC

Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC

69 A.D.3d 927, 892 N.Y.2d 788
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.3d 927 (Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC, 69 A.D.3d 927, 892 N.Y.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

The appeal from the order dated March 23, 2007, must be [928]*928dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Zimnoch v Bridge View Palace, LLC, 69 AD3d 928 [2010] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC
69 A.D.3d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 927, 892 N.Y.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimnoch-v-bridge-view-palace-llc-nyappdiv-2010.