Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC
69 A.D.3d 927, 892 N.Y.2d 788
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 A.D.3d 928 →
Opinion
The appeal from the order dated March 23, 2007, must be [928]*928dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Zimnoch v Bridge View Palace, LLC, 69 AD3d 928 [2010] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC, 69 A.D.3d 927, 892 N.Y.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).
69 A.D.3d 927 (Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC
69 A.D.3d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)