Zimmerman v. Union Canal Co.
1 Watts & Serg. 346
Opinion
The opinion of the President of the Quarter Sessions is so full on all the points involved, and it so accurately expresses the sentiments of this court, that we deem it sufficient to refer to it for our reasons in holding that the inquisition was properly set aside.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zimmerman v. Union Canal Co., 1 Watts & Serg. 346 (Pa. 1841).
1 Watts & Serg. 346 (Zimmerman v. Union Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bailey v. United States
78 Fed. Cl. 239 (Federal Claims, 2007)
Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson
223 U.S. 605 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Sloan v. Hoyt
40 Pa. Super. 181 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Freeland v. Pennsylvania Railroad
47 A. 745 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Richardson v. United States
100 F. 714 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia, 1900)
Allen v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. R.
33 S.E. 696 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Gilchrist's Appeal
109 Pa. 600 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1885)
Spencer v. Point Pleasant & Ohio R. R.
23 W. Va. 406 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1884)
Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Lawrence
1 Foster 401 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1873)
Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R.
51 N.H. 504 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)
Wainwright v. McCullough
63 Pa. 66 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Stover v. Jack
60 Pa. 339 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1869)
Steamboat Magnolia v. Marshall
39 Miss. 109 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1860)
Commissioners of Homochitto River v. Withers
29 Miss. 21 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1855)
Mumma v. Harrisburg, Portsmouth, Mount Joy, & Lancaster Railroad
1 Pears. 65 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1854)