Zaikowski v. Monzon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zaikowski v. Monzon

277 A.D.2d 459, 715 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 459 (Zaikowski v. Monzon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zaikowski v. Monzon, 277 A.D.2d 459, 715 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered April 13, 1999, which denied the fathers’s objections to an order of the same court (Lynaugh, H.E.), entered February 4, 1999, which, after a hearing, determined that the arrears of child support and medical insurance were $7,714.14 and $4,800, respectively, and directed, inter alia, that judgments be entered against him in those amounts.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to order and, if necessary, settle a transcript of the hearing. Since the parties did not stipulate to proceeding without the transcript, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Family Ct Act § 1118, CPLR 5525, 5526; 22 NYCRR 670.10 [a]; see, Svoboda v Svoboda, 275 AD2d 742; Matter of Robinson v Fisher, 275 AD2d 326; Matter of Jerome v Davis, 187 AD2d 514; Matter of Baiko v Baiko, 141 AD2d 635). We note that the appellant’s motion to be provided with a free transcript of the proceedings was denied by decision and order of this Court dated March 2, 2000. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered April 13, 1999, which denied the fathers’s objections to an order of the same court (Lynaugh, H.E.), entered February 4, 1999, which, after a hearing, determined that the arrears of child support and medical insurance were $7,714.14 and $4,800, respectively, and directed, inter alia, that judgments be entered against him in those amounts.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to order and, if necessary, settle a transcript of the hearing. Since the parties did not stipulate to proceeding without the transcript, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Family Ct Act § 1118, CPLR 5525, 5526; 22 NYCRR 670.10 [a]; see, Svoboda v Svoboda, 275 AD2d 742; Matter of Robinson v Fisher, 275 AD2d 326; Matter of Jerome v Davis, 187 AD2d 514; Matter of Baiko v Baiko, 141 AD2d 635). We note that the appellant’s motion to be provided with a free transcript of the proceedings was denied by decision and order of this Court dated March 2, 2000. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 459, 715 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaikowski-v-monzon-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack