Baiko v. Baiko

141 A.D.2d 635, 530 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6629
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1988·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Casher, H. E.), entered March 31, 1986, which, inter alia, denied his application for a downward modification of his spousal and child support payments, and directed him to pay $110 per week in spousal and child support. The appellant’s objections to that order were overruled in an order of the same court (Mosca, J.), dated January 20, 1987.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

In this case the full record of the proceedings in the Family Court has not been transcribed. Although Family Court Act § 1116 dispenses with the requirement that the record on appeal be printed, that provision does not excuse compliance with CPLR 5525 (a) made applicable to the Family Court pursuant to Family Court Act § 1118, which necessitates the [636]*636transcription of the record. Since the appellant herein has failed to order and settle the transcript of the proceedings and since the exception set forth in CPLR 5525 (b) is not applicable, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Davidson v Ha Il-Bo, 117 AD2d 776; Perry v Tauro, 21 AD2d 804). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baiko v. Baiko, 141 A.D.2d 635, 530 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

141 A.D.2d 635 (Baiko v. Baiko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leichter-Kessler v. Kessler
117 A.D.3d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Katz v. Dotan
90 A.D.3d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Zullo v. Hom
22 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Rudick v. Rudick
16 A.D.3d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Zaikowski v. Monzon
277 A.D.2d 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Patel v. Patel
270 A.D.2d 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Davis v. Pegues
266 A.D.2d 288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cangro v. Cangro
244 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Schmitt v. Berwitz
230 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Austin v. Austin
204 A.D.2d 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Meier v. Meier
204 A.D.2d 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
In re the Conservatorship of Nicoll
191 A.D.2d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Kletzkin v. Kletzkin
189 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Jerome v. Davis
187 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Fucci v. Fucci
166 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)