Zullo v. Hom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zullo v. Hom

22 A.D.3d 675, 801 N.Y.S.2d 913

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), dated January 16, 2004, which, inter alia, denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated December 8, 2003, denying his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed, since the appellant failed to order and settle a transcript of the hearing (see CPLR 5525 [a]; [676] Cangro v Cangro, 244 AD2d 310 [1997]; Matter of Baiko v Baiko, 141 AD2d 635 [1988]). H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), dated January 16, 2004, which, inter alia, denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated December 8, 2003, denying his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed, since the appellant failed to order and settle a transcript of the hearing (see CPLR 5525 [a]; [676] Cangro v Cangro, 244 AD2d 310 [1997]; Matter of Baiko v Baiko, 141 AD2d 635 [1988]). H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Zullo v. Hom, 22 A.D.3d 675, 801 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

22 A.D.3d 675 (Zullo v. Hom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related