Remy v. Mitchell
This text of 60 A.D.3d 860 (Remy v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Fondacaro, S.M.), dated October 3, 2007, which, after a hearing, inter alia, fixed child support arrears against him in the sum of $5,691.13.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see Family Ct Act § 1118; CPLR 5525 [a]; Matter of Zaikowski v Monzon, 277 AD2d 459 [2000]). The failure to provide necessary transcripts inhibits the Court’s ability to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal (see Matter of Rudick v Rudick, 16 AD3d 514 [2005]). In this proceeding, the father failed to provide a transcript of the hearing. This appeal must be dismissed as the papers provided were patently insufficient for the purpose of reviewing the issues he raised (see Matter of Rudick v Rudick, 16 AD3d 514 [2005]; Sultan v Sultan, 295 AD2d 498, 499 [2002]; Svoboda v Svoboda, 275 AD2d 742 [2000]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.3d 860, 874 N.Y.S.2d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remy-v-mitchell-nyappdiv-2009.